breakout candidate vs. proven star

[MC]

Perhaps, but i'd look towards Petrie or, more likely, Adams before Harvey. Good luck though

[coolfugitiv0]

well his team will improve...normally resulting in better scores

That's what you take from an improving team?

My thoughts are that an in an improving team, there's more players to steal a greater share of the pie.
Remember that each game only gets 3300 points.

[Jay]

Perhaps, but i'd look towards Petrie or, more likely, Adams before Harvey. Good luck though

id rather danger than either of them ;)

well his team will improve...normally resulting in better scores

That's what you take from an improving team?

My thoughts are that an in an improving team, there's more players to steal a greater share of the pie.
Remember that each game only gets 3300 points.

yeah true...my bad

[MC]

id rather danger than either of them ;) 

Only problem is - so does everyone else on these forums - though he has played 2 decent NAB games, what did I expect?

[Jay]

haha yeah MC...he has potential to score the huge tons tho!!!

only 3 votes between them in the poll...

[bomberboy0618]

In annoyed Danger had huge games, was on him for ages :P

[tor01doc]

My thoughts are that an in an improving team, there's more players to steal a greater share of the pie.
Remember that each game only gets 3300 points

Yes but no but yes...

The winning team gets a greater proportion of the 3300 on offer.

Say Hawthorn beat Collingwood then Hawthorn players may share 2000 between them and Pies get the dregs (1300).

SC favours players from better teams I reckon.