Can Christian Howard become the Matt Suckling of 2012?

Started by Jroo, March 12, 2012, 02:12:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Can Christian Howard become the Matt Suckling of 2012?

Yes
15 (39.5%)
No
23 (60.5%)

Total Members Voted: 3

Jroo

Christian Howard                Matt Suckling (Start of 2011)
$239, 400                        $223, 400
Entering 3rd Year              Entering 3rd Year
Played 6 Games last year    Played 5 Games Last year
Averaged 44pts                Averaged 57 pts
Also with him being cheaper than Hargrave and Lake could he be a better opition?

Swallow12

Really all depends on what the new coach plays him as, but cant see him averaging anywhere near Suckling

itchytradefinger

Wow! The similarities are unbelieveable!

Don't forget the prices were all diferent last year; adjusted for the fact our squads had 33, not 30.

Hawks finished top 4 in 2011, Dogs won't make top 11.  A very risky pick IMO. I had him last year..... pretty sure he'll improve his average considerably but you're likely to get stuck with a guy averaging something in the 60's.....

Torpedo10

He should lift his avg to about 65 but 70 at the most. I doubt he'll get as high as Suckling has this year.

Torress

simply a no.

dogs are no where near as good as the hawks. alot of hawks benefited from this gamestyle. but i can't see as many dogs benefiting from this gamestyle as they are no where near as good on a whole. i think howard will get more ball but to the scoring extent of suckling i think not!

demon_spud

Suckling has a dynamite left foot and was used as the outlet man from the backline, don't think Howard has the same skills. Also running with a Lake & Hargrave back line. Unless someone can point out why Conca a would be better....

SonsOfZeus

Quote from: demon_spud on March 12, 2012, 03:06:40 PM
Suckling has a dynamite left foot and was used as the outlet man from the backline, don't think Howard has the same skills. Also running with a Lake & Hargrave back line. Unless someone can point out why Conca a would be better....

none of conca,lake or hargrave will be top 7 backs y have them

meow meow

No, he can not. Not while Murphy is still in the team.

coolfugitiv0

Quote from: SonsOfZeus on March 12, 2012, 07:54:34 PM
Quote from: demon_spud on March 12, 2012, 03:06:40 PM
Suckling has a dynamite left foot and was used as the outlet man from the backline, don't think Howard has the same skills. Also running with a Lake & Hargrave back line. Unless someone can point out why Conca a would be better....

none of conca,lake or hargrave will be top 7 backs y have them

None of your rookies will be top 7 in their respective positions. Why have them?
TO MAKE MONEY, that's why.

Wolf67


cortez

Quote from: Swallow12 on March 12, 2012, 02:49:31 PM
Really all depends on what the new coach plays him as, but cant see him averaging anywhere near Suckling

Everyone said that suckling wouldnt average what he did last year either ;-)

Ziplock

that's a lie cortez

nobody was speaking about suckling last year :P

those that were considering him kept him close to their chest, nobody else said squat :P

4INAROW

sucklings name popped up in the sc gold preseason review last year. i think it was that calvin bloke who wrote a big rap on him and said he was a must have, thats why i gave him a crack