McIntosh and Kreuzer

[billnats]

Who's taking the punt and having both of these guys?

I have 300K in the bank to upgrade either one but with Mumford and Sandi's injuries I am not sure if its worth it. Im thinking of possibly upgrading a rookie defender instead.

[Edge]

ive got both of them, as planned since last year
with giles and stephensen as back up .
ive done this because im not caring about rucks as much this year.
choosing to focus the saved money on defenders and forwards instead

[JamSainter]

Mumford's injured?

[pavs nose]

Mumford's injured?

i had both for a long time but now just mac daddy + giles + redden + large 'o'. set and forget ruckmen are soooo 2010

[JamSainter]

Mumford's injured?

i had both for a long time but now just mac daddy + giles + redden + large 'o'. set and forget ruckmen are soooo 2010

Ballsy, good luck!

[cortez]

pretty sure mumford us not injured...

[sid3bysid3]

Agree setting and leaving rucks is not as big a deal now. Lot of good options. Think a must is picking first ruck. Even better if like mummy their is no comp

[The Supercoach]

i been thinking about it for a while, but i think i might just go with H Mac because i know he is capable of scoring big, while kruezer will average in the 90's at absolute best, cant see him ripping out a 140 anytime soon, while someone like mummy can do that every 4-6 weeks

[billnats]

Well I was referring to saving cash and having them both. I actually have the money to get Mumford if I wanted.

Ps. I know mummy isn't injured but he is injury prone

[JamSainter]

It's pretty difficult to be amazingly durable if you're a ruckman as you are crashing into other big bodies every ball up! Mumford is quite durable for a big man, also because he is huge. I reckon he is the heaviest current AFL player.

[Ziplock]

he's actually substantially lighter than both witts and sandilands ftr.