Why No Love For Andy Carrazzo?

[Windigo]

Seeing him in absolutely no teams?

Why is this?  ???

Yes, okay he is tagger. But has averaged 100 in the past and averaged a healthy 91 this year.

Shaping as a real unique.

Played 16 games at a 91 clip.

Take out that horrendous 37 against a Pies team full of untaggable players and his next worse was a 62.

Scored a ton 6 times from 16 starts. Couple that with 7 scores of over 80....Do the math, 13 80+ games from 16. Mr Consistent.

A classy ton last night only adds to my case...If he ain't tagging he dominates. Surely Rats will give the tagging duties over to Ellard? Will miss a NAB. But, meh.

[Victorius Secret]

Yes, probably he may get tagging duties throughout the season.

and also he is more expensive then the likes of Shaw, Deledio, Birchall, Enright, Suckling, Broughton, Heppell..

I would pay a little extra for Heath Scotland instead.   :)

[mezzoculo]

I would pay a little extra for Heath Scotland instead.   :)

+1. Love Carrot's work but Scotland has the better DT role.

[Windigo]

Scotland Vs Carrazzo In 2011:

Price:

Scotland: $493,500
Carrazzo: $454,800

Games Played:

Scotland: 22 games
Carrazzo: 16 games

Tons:

Scotland: 11
Carrazzo: 6

+80 Scores:

Scotland: 19 (86%)
Carrazzo: 13 (81%)

Take out that 37 from Andy. He averaged 96 a game.

[mezzoculo]

Scotland Vs Carrazzo In 2011:

Price:

Scotland: $493,500
Carrazzo: $454,800

Games Played:

Scotland: 22 games
Carrazzo: 16 games

Tons:

Scotland: 11
Carrazzo: 6

+80 Scores:

Scotland: 19 (86%)
Carrazzo: 13 (81%)

Take out that 37 from Andy. He averaged 96 a game.

Are you asking questions and then answering them youself just to boost your post count, Windigo?  ;)

[TheMailman]

Scotland Vs Carrazzo In 2011:

Price:

Scotland: $493,500
Carrazzo: $454,800

Games Played:

Scotland: 22 games
Carrazzo: 16 games

Tons:

Scotland: 11
Carrazzo: 6

+80 Scores:

Scotland: 19 (86%)
Carrazzo: 13 (81%)

Take out that 37 from Andy. He averaged 96 a game.

Are you asking questions and then answering them youself just to boost your post count, Windigo?  ;)

Technically you provided a reason not to pick Carrazzo and Windigo rebutted it :P

Good post btw Windy. Do you think he'll provide better value than Shaw/Delidio/Birchall?

[Windigo]

Haha, that's what my brother does. He asks a question and then he like answers it himself anywhere. 

I must think I have the best opinion on my own problem.  :P

IMO, Andy C is a good option. Just whether you want to pay a little extra.

[jabroni]

carrots also has 2 mrp incidents from yesterday so hold off

[TheMailman]

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/130081/default.aspx

He's only going to miss next week against Brisbane but you shouldn't be buying him based on Nab anyway

[Windigo]

Only the one week so all's good.

But has averaged over 100 in the past.

[mezzoculo]

Technically you provided a reason not to pick Carrazzo and Windigo rebutted it :P

Good post btw Windy. Do you think he'll provide better value than Shaw/Delidio/Birchall?

Ahh, not really a rebuttal.  ???

Windigo's numbers all point toward Scotland being the better DTer - primarily because he doesn't tag.

[Windigo]

You save 40K. But really Scotland is the best defender going around in DT.

But I think Andy C is good value at his price. Also, whose to say Andy C  wouldn't slay in the games he missed.  :P

[mezzoculo]

You save 40K. But really Scotland is the best defender going around in DT.

But I think Andy C is good value at his price. Also, whose to say Andy C  wouldn't slay in the games he missed.  :P

True. If it wasn't for the byes then I would seriously consider both Andy and Heath in my starting line up.

[Adamant]

I brought him in today, he is getting way underpicked IMO and should be a good unique  ;)

[Birryfy]

I've got him, no hesitations, can live a tag every now and then.