Will you be starting Hmac?

[Birryfy]

People are too hesitant to start him with a premo, c'mon.

[TheMailman]

People are too hesitant to start him with a premo, c'mon.

I think you're a bit too easily influenced by Nab cup matches

[elephants]

I am leaving him. I don't think he will play without Goldy all season.

[Birryfy]

People are too hesitant to start him with a premo, c'mon.

I think you're a bit too easily influenced by Nab cup matches

80 something and 104, if he goes around this again, its not the poor skill of the NAB Cup.

[TheMailman]

Round 1 really is only for looking at rookies

shouldn't take anything into account there.

[owenbond007]

I was going premo and Giles. But Hmac is looking like a great bargain. There is no way i would go giles hmac. So i restructered my rucks to mccevoy hmac giles redden. Orren got the flick. I lost all faith. Cox had to go too as i couldnt play giles cox hmac.

[Spite]

I was going premo and Giles. But Hmac is looking like a great bargain. There is no way i would go giles hmac. So i restructered my rucks to mccevoy hmac giles redden. Orren got the flick. I lost all faith. Cox had to go too as i couldnt play giles cox hmac.

How did you get the funds to do that when you were starting a premo and giles? I just can't do it without dropping a different premo who would score more than H-Mac :S

[Holz]

im a bit disappointed hmac is doing so well, i have had him all pre season.  Hopefully people think its just from the lack of goldy and dont pick him.

[Windigo]

Just keep watching him.

But don't go making changes with H-Mac at one.

[essendon2]

I was going premo and Giles. But Hmac is looking like a great bargain. There is no way i would go giles hmac. So i restructered my rucks to mccevoy hmac giles redden. Orren got the flick. I lost all faith. Cox had to go too as i couldnt play giles cox hmac.

it wouldn't be that silly to have Hmac + Giles, think about it.
Premium Ruck (except Cox) will get you 95 ppg, at worst HMac will get 75 ppg.

It saves you 200k having Hmac, and that 200k could upgrade 2-3 players that will regain 20+ points!

[Kuruki]

Round 1 really is only for looking at rookies

shouldn't take anything into account there.

Sydney threw there entire ruck group at Hmac including the "set and forget" Mumford. HMac showed plenty.

[TheMailman]

Round 1 really is only for looking at rookies

shouldn't take anything into account there.

Sydney threw there entire ruck group at Hmac including the "set and forget" Mumford. HMac showed plenty.

Once again

Mumford is Sydney's entire ruck divison. Seaby and Pyke are reasonable, but together they aren't nearly as good as Mumford. Mumford wasn't even on for half the game and he got 2 less hitouts than Hmac. Hmac's scoring rate went down the moment Mumford came on.

Really from ruck terms Mumford tore apart Hmac.

[Ziplock]

not really- he had a slower quarter 4, but still had a big 3rd quarter. Keep in mind that mumford was fresh while Hmac had been running all game.

[Birryfy]

I don't care who he played on, how he played on them, or whether they had bad games themselves.

The fact is, he has played well, scored well and shows no sign of dropping off!

[TheMailman]

not really- he had a slower quarter 4, but still had a big 3rd quarter. Keep in mind that mumford was fresh while Hmac had been running all game.

Yeah you're right there, but Hmac did have support in Goldstein if when he needed it.

I'm not really sure why we started Mumford as a sub anyway.