Starting RUCKS!

Started by essendon2, March 03, 2012, 08:10:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Are you going HMac + Giles?

Yes
Maybe
Definitely Not

essendon2

HMac and Giles - would it be silly to start both of them, as your 1st and 2nd rucks?

Hmac over someone like Sandi, may lose you 20 ppg however, that 250k can easily improve other areas by more than 20 points!!!

what do you guys think?

Justin Bieber

You sure do ask a lot of questions on this essendon  ???

Jukes

I had this system earlier in the pre-season and I liked it. However I can see a lot more potential in going Berger/Giles than HamMac/Giles and 200k, in both scoring and risk factor.

Windigo

It's an option. But so many things can go awry with that ploy.  :P

Mozza3

The money you save is appealing but I can see some weeks where you might only get 120-130 points out of your two rucks.

essendon2

Quote from: Mozza3 on March 03, 2012, 08:57:50 PM
The money you save is appealing but I can see some weeks where you might only get 120-130 points out of your two rucks.
it's the risk that'll either make or break my team i guess!

essendon2

All the people that are voting NO, what's the justification of your opinions?

T Dog

Why a no? Giles on bench. Hmac not even on shortlist. In fact I will find it tricky to pick anyone in his side.

footyfan11

taking h-mac is a risk in itself, let alone starting the equally as risky giles. who steps up in their absence? stephensen??? have fun with your 30 points there while i sit comfortable

Ziplock

stephensen is underscoring for a very valid reason that won't matter come the H/A games.

but you guys have figure that out yourself :P

Justin Bieber

Im actually considering this. H Mac is killing it and can upgrade after byes.

Victorius Secret

Quote from: whatlez on March 03, 2012, 10:18:45 PM
Im actually considering this. H Mac is killing it and can upgrade after byes.

+1

H Mac and a premo. McIntosh is an absolute bargain.

If it wasnt for the byes i would have locked Leuenberger and McIntosh.

Justin Bieber

Quote from: Victorius Secret on March 03, 2012, 10:30:12 PM
Quote from: whatlez on March 03, 2012, 10:18:45 PM
Im actually considering this. H Mac is killing it and can upgrade after byes.

+1

H Mac and a premo. McIntosh is an absolute bargain.

If it wasnt for the byes i would have locked Leuenberger and McIntosh.
H Mac and Giles, if I do it. Biggest risk, but may pay off.

Victorius Secret

Quote from: whatlez on March 03, 2012, 10:32:45 PM
Quote from: Victorius Secret on March 03, 2012, 10:30:12 PM
Quote from: whatlez on March 03, 2012, 10:18:45 PM
Im actually considering this. H Mac is killing it and can upgrade after byes.

+1

H Mac and a premo. McIntosh is an absolute bargain.

If it wasnt for the byes i would have locked Leuenberger and McIntosh.
H Mac and Giles, if I do it. Biggest risk, but may pay off.

yep, and can rotate between the likes of Redden, Stephenson, Jenkins (etc) during the season based on opposition until upgrade time. I'm also considering this.  :)

Chelskiman

Too risky for my liking.  At the moment I have Jacobs and McEvoy, and I'm worried about even those two, lol.