Ask Ziplock Pre-season NAB1

Started by Ziplock, February 28, 2012, 11:26:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Doyle

Do you rate McEvoy? The boy on DT Talk are crazy about him, and I actually have him on my team and I think he's going to flourish this year.

Ziplock

Quote from: owenbond007 on March 16, 2012, 05:38:13 PM
Starting T.campbell as 4th ruck regardless of whether his elevated with cox redden giles combo?
not a massive fan. He has 3 rucks ahead of him, and it's not like he has any characteristics that dominate over them.

find the money to fork out for someone like jenkins, who mighten't be in weekly but should get more than a handful of games unlike campbell. Cheapskate :P

Ziplock

Quote from: Doyle on March 16, 2012, 06:43:51 PM
Do you rate McEvoy? The boy on DT Talk are crazy about him, and I actually have him on my team and I think he's going to flourish this year.

Well, he is the number one ruck, with no real competition. Kosi can pinch hit, but shouldn't be stealing too many point. I'd actually prefer jacobs in that price range, but if you're going for value premos, then it's really him, jacobs or mumford who should be on your radar.

Holz

#348
combo question for you


Grimes/Malceski (have both at the moment) + Fyfe + Porplyzia + Gibson (roos) + 40k

or

luke brown + Gray + Couch + Pendles

already have a strong midfield with ablett, boyd, swan, selwood but pendles is looking like a gun

Ziplock

Quote from: Holzman on March 16, 2012, 07:07:10 PM
combo question for you


Grimes/Malceski (have both at the moment) + Fyfe + Porplyzia + Gibson (roos) + 40k

or

luke brown + Gray + Couch + Pendles

already have a strong midfield with ablett, boyd, swan, selwood but pendles is looking like a gun
tbh, dislike both of them. Option one is ridiculously risky, with grimes/ malceski both with injury concerns, fyfe with some as well, and porps...

option 2- does brown even look like being in adelaides best yet? Couch is solid enough, should get games, pendles is a fine pick, and gray could go either way (but more likely to fail playing for port).

Honestly... I'm going for two, but I really dislike both options.

Holz

#350
Quote from: Ziplock on March 16, 2012, 07:24:59 PM
Quote from: Holzman on March 16, 2012, 07:07:10 PM
combo question for you


Grimes/Malceski (have both at the moment) + Fyfe + Porplyzia + Gibson (roos) + 40k

or

luke brown + Gray + Couch + Pendles

already have a strong midfield with ablett, boyd, swan, selwood but pendles is looking like a gun
tbh, dislike both of them. Option one is ridiculously risky, with grimes/ malceski both with injury concerns, fyfe with some as well, and porps...

option 2- does brown even look like being in adelaides best yet? Couch is solid enough, should get games, pendles is a fine pick, and gray could go either way (but more likely to fail playing for port).

Honestly... I'm going for two, but I really dislike both options.

i actually agree im keeping grimes and malceski but dropped porplyzia for crouch, fyfe for gray and turned hmac into cox


my  queston with already Pav, franklin, martin and sidebottom who would you pick as your 5th forward (no goodes) and who do you trsut as your back premiums i have lids goddard and sahw and have no confidence in any others so that why im getting eski and grimes

TheMailman

Malceski isn't even in the Swans 22

Bad choice IMO. Nothing like what he was in 2010

Holz

Quote from: TheMailman on March 16, 2012, 07:38:42 PM
Malceski isn't even in the Swans 22

Bad choice IMO. Nothing like what he was in 2010

what makes you say that is named this week and has been very solid in the nab

Ziplock

Quote from: Holzman on March 16, 2012, 07:35:11 PM
Quote from: Ziplock on March 16, 2012, 07:24:59 PM
Quote from: Holzman on March 16, 2012, 07:07:10 PM
combo question for you


Grimes/Malceski (have both at the moment) + Fyfe + Porplyzia + Gibson (roos) + 40k

or

luke brown + Gray + Couch + Pendles

already have a strong midfield with ablett, boyd, swan, selwood but pendles is looking like a gun
tbh, dislike both of them. Option one is ridiculously risky, with grimes/ malceski both with injury concerns, fyfe with some as well, and porps...

option 2- does brown even look like being in adelaides best yet? Couch is solid enough, should get games, pendles is a fine pick, and gray could go either way (but more likely to fail playing for port).

Honestly... I'm going for two, but I really dislike both options.

i actually agree im keeping grimes and malceski but dropped porplyzia for crouch, fyfe for gray and turned hmac into cox


my  queston with already Pav, franklin, martin and sidebottom who would you pick as your 5th forward (no goodes) and who do you trsut as your back premiums i have lids goddard and sahw and have no confidence in any others so that why im getting eski and grimes
so someone cheaper than sidebottom or anyone? If anyone, chapman :P If cheaper than sidebottom... green could be a sneaky unique?

keep in mind, either of there could be great POD players or failures :P

TheMailman

Quote from: Holzman on March 16, 2012, 07:41:36 PM
Quote from: TheMailman on March 16, 2012, 07:38:42 PM
Malceski isn't even in the Swans 22

Bad choice IMO. Nothing like what he was in 2010

what makes you say that is named this week and has been very solid in the nab

Honestly, Swans have better backline without him.

He isn't really in any sort of form. Being named against GC isn't any special feat. A bench player at best

Holz

Quote from: Ziplock on March 16, 2012, 07:42:50 PM
Quote from: Holzman on March 16, 2012, 07:35:11 PM
Quote from: Ziplock on March 16, 2012, 07:24:59 PM
Quote from: Holzman on March 16, 2012, 07:07:10 PM
combo question for you


Grimes/Malceski (have both at the moment) + Fyfe + Porplyzia + Gibson (roos) + 40k

or

luke brown + Gray + Couch + Pendles

already have a strong midfield with ablett, boyd, swan, selwood but pendles is looking like a gun
tbh, dislike both of them. Option one is ridiculously risky, with grimes/ malceski both with injury concerns, fyfe with some as well, and porps...

option 2- does brown even look like being in adelaides best yet? Couch is solid enough, should get games, pendles is a fine pick, and gray could go either way (but more likely to fail playing for port).

Honestly... I'm going for two, but I really dislike both options.

i actually agree im keeping grimes and malceski but dropped porplyzia for crouch, fyfe for gray and turned hmac into cox


my  queston with already Pav, franklin, martin and sidebottom who would you pick as your 5th forward (no goodes) and who do you trsut as your back premiums i have lids goddard and sahw and have no confidence in any others so that why im getting eski and grimes
so someone cheaper than sidebottom or anyone? If anyone, chapman :P If cheaper than sidebottom... green could be a sneaky unique?

keep in mind, either of there could be great POD players or failures :P

well im open to picking anyone if i can see ture premiums to upgrade too i will downgrade cox to hmac and spend the 265k upgrading gray, malceski and grimes. I just cant see a solid player i know will pump out premium likes socres.

If i gave you 265k and said upgrade those 3 what would you do

no lids, goddard,shaw, franklin, pav, martin, sidebottom

Ziplock

malc to waters, grimes to heppell/ broughton/ hanley, gray to chapman

I think that fits?

Holz

Quote from: Ziplock on March 16, 2012, 08:03:20 PM
malc to waters, grimes to heppell/ broughton/ hanley, gray to chapman

I think that fits?

it does but eski to scotland and gray to chapman also fits

Justin Bieber

The thread continues!!

So Zip Heath Shaw, worth the cash? Or is Broughton a better option.

Ziplock

Quote from: Holzman on March 16, 2012, 08:07:55 PM
Quote from: Ziplock on March 16, 2012, 08:03:20 PM
malc to waters, grimes to heppell/ broughton/ hanley, gray to chapman

I think that fits?

it does but eski to scotland and gray to chapman also fits

well then do that :P