Rob Murphy vs Shannon Hurn vs Adcock

Started by The Supercoach, February 28, 2012, 11:19:18 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Robert Murphy vs Shannon Hurn - Who will have a better year?

Murphy
Hurn
Adcock

The Supercoach

If you think anyone else around this price that has a round 11 bye feel free to comment

Ringo

Adcock, Hanley or Scott Thompson worth consideration as well.

The Supercoach

adcock a good thought, i will add him to the pole. but i have never really seen thompson as a great sc scorer although his avg last year wasnt alll to bad

tor01doc

Suckling $1700 more than Adcock.

Murphy and Hurn a bit up and down for me.

So I won't vote in your poll. It is a free country after all...except you have to vote so I will.

Of those 3 - Add a cock.

JamSainter


Justin Bieber

Quote from: Ringo on February 28, 2012, 11:33:29 PM
Adcock, Hanley or Scott Thompson worth consideration as well.
lol I thought you meant the other Scott Thompson, since the Norht guy never gets talked about...

quinny88

Such a tricky price range under 500k in the backline..
Thats why im only going with a 3 prem backline and loading my mid more.
Too much inconsistancy in the backs, including 500k+ players like broughton and birchall

Mick Neill

Malceski could be someone to think of.... abit of a smokie I feel.... :)

Samm79

In my opinion none are keepers (although I tried to make Hurn one last year!), none are cash cows. Murphy the pick of the bunch, consider Malceski as MMN suggested.

bowyanger



Hurn is the most durable / less likely to get injured

Hurn has still yet to reach his full potential / prime age so is progressing each year.

Hurn has a unique advantage of playing at Subi every 2nd week...same could be said for Adcock but the lions are half the team WC is which also affects confidence / performance of individual players.