Walsh or Smedts

big davo · February 25, 2012, 01:21:51 AM

Tommy walsh was unsited tonight, but should I get rid of him for that? Thoughts?

Justin Bieber · February 25, 2012, 01:24:05 AM

Don't stress. Keep both for the moment...

Holz · February 25, 2012, 01:32:46 AM

i have both but im losing abit of trust in the forward rookies, especially if zorko isnt in round 1. If i had to drop one of them i would drop walsh just because smedts DPP could be helpful.

Manbearpig · February 25, 2012, 02:53:44 AM

Wait until it's closer to round one and then decide. You don't even know if they'll be playing yet.

Windigo · February 25, 2012, 11:08:24 AM

Just keep monitoring both of them.

Give Walsh a bit more time. Has never played a game of AFL. Only been playing VFL for two years.

ubeaut · February 25, 2012, 11:22:20 AM

I was thinking there was heaps of opportunity in the swans forward line until last night. Now they have Seaby, White, Pike, Reid, Spangher will be back and of course Goodes at times. Hard to see him getting games early.

underdog11 · February 25, 2012, 02:30:08 PM

I am also Deciding on these two considering They both have the byes in 12. Which ever one I choose will be a cash cow

Victorius Secret · February 25, 2012, 02:34:42 PM

smedts.

my team has a strict one gaelic footballer policy and i went with marty clarke

Colliwobblers · February 25, 2012, 02:48:18 PM

smedts over walsh but i have both looking to replace walsh with zorko tho even if zorko is round two or threee return he is a better pick than most fwd rooks, hampton and smedts are my locks pfieffer is the biggest lock of all but may start in my midfield