Conca, Lake, Howard, Hargrave,

Started by underdog11, February 23, 2012, 12:07:03 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

which one, if if your taking one would you take?

Conca
17 (37%)
Lake
6 (13%)
Howard
4 (8.7%)
Hargrave
19 (41.3%)

Total Members Voted: 4

Print
Go Down Pages1 2
User actions

underdog11

February 23, 2012, 12:07:03 AM
Personally i dont have any, and that most likely wont change unless someone goes down in my backline. I think this year is the best time to have the guns and rooks. Interested to see votes and responses though

Colliwobblers

#1
February 23, 2012, 12:14:55 AM
i agree with you except after the top few def elites the scoring will be much the same so why not risk a mid pricer in def, im going one in def and 1 up fwd.

hargrave looked great in the nab game but im going conca

elephants

#2
February 23, 2012, 01:18:07 AM
I have Conca and maybe Hargrave or Howard to get a look in.

craftcoat

#3
February 23, 2012, 01:24:24 AM
i think Howard has far more upside than Hargrave; 3rd yr breakout rule, groomed for spot on the wing (according to interview on AFL site a week ago) & has greatly improved his strength/fitness over summer. Hargrave's had one good year and a good first round NAB cup. People are getting too carried away with Hargrave imo

yorgis

#4
February 23, 2012, 02:37:35 PM
howard looks a bit like higgo, hope he's not as injury prone

nostradamus

#5
February 23, 2012, 07:06:59 PM
l'll be watching hargrave after the way he played in rnd 1 in the nab cup

Justin Bieber

#6
February 23, 2012, 08:40:27 PM
Conca or Hargrave. Undecided.

mezzoculo

#7
February 23, 2012, 09:00:05 PM
Quote from: whatlez on February 23, 2012, 08:40:27 PM
Conca or Hargrave. Undecided.
Conca is better. But go Hargraves cause I want to win!!!  ;)

Justin Bieber

#8
February 23, 2012, 09:05:03 PM
Quote from: mezzoculo on February 23, 2012, 09:00:05 PM
Quote from: whatlez on February 23, 2012, 08:40:27 PM
Conca or Hargrave. Undecided.
Conca is better. But go Hargraves cause I want to win!!!  ;)

lol that's what I say haha. Did you do that on purpose? Well I don't have either :P

mezzoculo

#9
February 23, 2012, 10:24:12 PM
Quote from: whatlez on February 23, 2012, 09:05:03 PM
Quote from: mezzoculo on February 23, 2012, 09:00:05 PM
Quote from: whatlez on February 23, 2012, 08:40:27 PM
Conca or Hargrave. Undecided.
Conca is better. But go Hargraves cause I want to win!!!  ;)

lol that's what I say haha. Did you do that on purpose? Well I don't have either :P
;D Copy / pasted from another thread then changed the names  ;D

Justin Bieber

#10
February 23, 2012, 10:44:32 PM
Quote from: mezzoculo on February 23, 2012, 10:24:12 PM
Quote from: whatlez on February 23, 2012, 09:05:03 PM
Quote from: mezzoculo on February 23, 2012, 09:00:05 PM
Quote from: whatlez on February 23, 2012, 08:40:27 PM
Conca or Hargrave. Undecided.
Conca is better. But go Hargraves cause I want to win!!!  ;)

lol that's what I say haha. Did you do that on purpose? Well I don't have either :P
;D Copy / pasted from another thread then changed the names  ;D

lol. But seriously I want to win so go the opposite.

Windigo

#11
February 23, 2012, 10:45:24 PM
I currently have none.

Need some more NAB games for me to really lock any of them in.

.....Conca has been scrubbed so it makes picking him very tricky.

PowerBug

#12
February 23, 2012, 11:27:01 PM
I don't wanna say it, but Hargrave.

underdog11

#13
February 25, 2012, 01:24:16 PM
why is everyone writing off lake?

elephants

#14
February 25, 2012, 05:54:13 PM
Quote from: underdog11 on February 25, 2012, 01:24:16 PM
why is everyone writing off lake?
Never an option for my team. Unfit and old. One good season doesn't make a fantasy lock every year.
Print
Go Up Pages1 2
User actions