chad wingard

[4INAROW]

latest reports reckon he dominated in an intra club match.

this would normally be good news, except he was playing against port where most of us would rack up 20 odd possies and kick 4.2.

regardless anyone got any info on this kid or considering him with his price bracket?

[Ziplock]

I think the general consensus is that from the first round draft picks, the ones most likely to contribute with fantasy value and wingard and coniglio.

ftr, against port most of us could probably run close enough to the goal for 6.0 not 4.2 :P

[4INAROW]

sorry i was assuming using the "oppo". yeh ive tried to stay away from the higher priced rookies but he seems to be tearing it up, if he really stands out in nab, might be hard to stay away even at that price

[DrBill]

I think there's better options out there to play early games. This from the afl website...

Despite naming Wingard a certain starter next Sunday, Primus said the 18-year-old's fitness base isn't where it needs to be to play regular AFL football.

"He's classy with the ball, but to play a full game and spend a bit of time out there is where we've got to get him to because he's probably not quite there yet."

[4INAROW]

grouse thanks

[Mozza3]

At his price you'd want him to average 5-10 more than a $110 rookie and i can't see that happening.

[CrowsFan]

I think there's better options out there to play early games. This from the afl website...

Despite naming Wingard a certain starter next Sunday, Primus said the 18-year-old's fitness base isn't where it needs to be to play regular AFL football.

"He's classy with the ball, but to play a full game and spend a bit of time out there is where we've got to get him to because he's probably not quite there yet."

Sounds like he could be the perfect option to be the sub each week...

[4INAROW]

that's what it sounds like, i may find the money for caddy if he tears it up , or hopefully a $110k tears it up and i'll take him