Should I Get Both Swan + Pendlebury?

[essendon2]

money is not a factor!I have Pendles and selwood at the moment but have $114,000 in the bank! which option is the best?

[picker_man]

might aswell have the best ;)

[Holz]

If you can use the extra cash somewhere else go Swanny and Selwood if not Swanny and Pendles should be the Highest scoring combo.

[Colliwobblers]

If you can use the extra cash somewhere else go Swanny and Selwood if not Swanny and Pendles should be the Highest scoring combo.

+1

[Grannyboy]

I very nearly did it last year then kicked myself for not doing it after the season started. You can't really go wrong with those two, can you?

[The Silent Partner]

thinking about that also Swan + Pendles drop selwood for Boyd

[SydneyRox]

do we assume you also have GAJ in the team?

[elephants]

Swan, Pendles and Selwood all in my team from the offy.

[DrSpin]

I have Pends, GAJ and Selwood.

[Holz]

Swan, Pendles and Selwood all in my team from the offy.

wouldn't it better to say bring in Boyd. I assume your copping a donut so lets say you less 100 points going Pendles over Boyd will not make that up over 13 rounds. If your not taking the donut you will have to use a trade, issue one i dont see it worth the possibly points gained ( isay possible as boyd could beat pendles) and you might need the trades in the forward line and backline you already need to use, and if injuries occur than you will be in major trouble.

This is of course if you only care about overall if its league you can just drop the round

[essendon2]

Swan, Pendles and Selwood all in my team from the offy.

wouldn't it better to say bring in Boyd. I assume your copping a donut so lets say you less 100 points going Pendles over Boyd will not make that up over 13 rounds. If your not taking the donut you will have to use a trade, issue one i dont see it worth the possibly points gained ( isay possible as boyd could beat pendles) and you might need the trades in the forward line and backline you already need to use, and if injuries occur than you will be in major trouble.

This is of course if you only care about overall if its league you can just drop the round

yeah look... already got Boyd.
haha my MID is
Pendles, Boyd, Ablett, Selwood, Tyson, Horsley
but will go Selwood > Swan

[SydneyRox]

I would also suggest you spread the risk with Boyd. You can choose either swan or pendles then upgrade the other later.

[Holz]

Swan, Pendles and Selwood all in my team from the offy.

wouldn't it better to say bring in Boyd. I assume your copping a donut so lets say you less 100 points going Pendles over Boyd will not make that up over 13 rounds. If your not taking the donut you will have to use a trade, issue one i dont see it worth the possibly points gained ( isay possible as boyd could beat pendles) and you might need the trades in the forward line and backline you already need to use, and if injuries occur than you will be in major trouble.

This is of course if you only care about overall if its league you can just drop the round

yeah look... already got Boyd.
haha my MID is
Pendles, Boyd, Ablett, Selwood, Tyson, Horsley
but will go Selwood > Swan

the point still stands, would go murphy or rockliff than

[elephants]

Not going 5 premiums in the middle so yeah swan or pendles will find themselves on the outer in favour of a rookie or mid-pricer.

[Just Clancy]

Swan, Pendles and Selwood all in my team from the offy.

What about the bye?