Rucks!!!

Started by lordy9, February 13, 2012, 05:39:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

which way is everyone going with the rucks

two prems
35 (64.8%)
one pream and rooke
10 (18.5%)
two rookes
0 (0%)
two meadims
0 (0%)
pream meadim
9 (16.7%)

Total Members Voted: 4

Colliwobblers

same as almost everyone else according to the poll :)

Football Factory

Im unique   8)  ..  Sandi , H.Mac

Flame

Quote from: FOOTBALL FACTORY on February 13, 2012, 08:52:42 PM
Im unique   8)  ..  Sandi , H.Mac
That is my combo too. See how hmac goes in the nab though!

bundyboy

no so unique...:)

mummi and hmac for me..

and yes - depending on NAB form for Hmac...

stew42

Just thinking about the negative effect of NicNat on Coxy, wasn't Seaby a much bigger second ruck around 2005? Cox sure is used to it...

Capper

Quote from: stew42 on February 15, 2012, 01:39:28 AM
Just thinking about the negative effect of NicNat on Coxy, wasn't Seaby a much bigger second ruck around 2005? Cox sure is used to it...
and it hasnt affected his numbers either

Kuruki

Quote from: jabroni on February 13, 2012, 06:12:16 PM
2 premos

set and forget works every year and its great to have one line less to worry about upgrading

Tell that to everyone who had Sandiiands last year. There is no such thing as set and forget, unless your happy to sit 400+ thousand on the pine if your ruck goes down.
I have made plenty of teams with two premo rucks this pre season, none of them looked anything other then middle of the pack. Will just have to wait and see if it's the pack that pulls ahead of the risk takers or the other way round.

Ziplock


Bruce McAvaney

1 prem

Witts will be the 3rd rook

Capper


elephants

1 prem 3 rooks. rowe/dericx/witts for last rook.

The F.A.R.K.

no

Giles, Stephenson and Redden and you will agree with me LE after NAB

elephants

Quote from: The F.A.R.K. on February 16, 2012, 11:54:58 PM
no

Giles, Stephenson and Redden and you will agree with me LE after NAB
Meh, whoever scores best and has good JS will be number 4.

Justin Bieber

Why is this thread still going?