Mumford or Leuenberger?

[erich1036]

Hey guys, I'm having a bit of trouble deciding between the two big fellas? Who would you pick and why?

[nathan11]

burger cause he is 50 000 cheaper if for 2nd ruck if only 1 go mummy

[jamesalex]

I've got both.

[Speculator]

I'd go leuenberger because he is cheaper and mummy seems to miss games through little injuries and suspension. They are both great options though. I had mummy last year, like most people who started with sandi, and my god didn't he tear it up.

[Bosh]

Mummy, He is better around the ground and imo his tap work is better as well. He seems to clear the ball a lot when it's in a tight huddle and tackles a lot more than burger.

[coolfugitiv0]

I've got both.

Ditto!
I like your style my friend.

[CuStArDaRm]

I've got both.

Ditto!
I like your style my friend.

+2 ;)

Little Risk and great ceiling for both. Think it will be quite a unique combo to have these 2 but with very little risk. Im sure at some stage Ill be swearing at not having cox after a 180 odd though  :P

[Jake8]

I wish I could afford both. I have Nic Nat instead of Mumford.

[Footyrulz]

mummy if u can afford. but dont sacrifice another important upgrade for him.

[ben_020285]

I have both but if I had to choose one I would choose Mumford.

[sammyo7]

mummy vs gws in round 1 he'll destroy them

[cortez]

Both will score great this season ill say luey tho. Reckon brisbane are on the up which means more points for him :-)

[Talisman]

I've got both.

Ditto!
I like your style my friend.

+2 ;)

Little Risk and great ceiling for both. Think it will be quite a unique combo to have these 2 but with very little risk. Im sure at some stage Ill be swearing at not having cox after a 180 odd though  :P

+3!! Although I thought it was going to be a unique combo as well, but it looks like there might be a few others out there thinking exactly the same way... Damn! ;)