porpylzia or christensen

eagles_h · February 06, 2012, 10:56:09 PM

The Supercoach · February 06, 2012, 11:00:38 PM

Christensen is an overrated nugget that has had a few good games one being the GF and thats why everyone is getting him, to premature to get him IMO. Porps is a proven player but has a HUGE injury cloud above his head waiting to rain down on his shoulder. I would say PORPS only cause of his price. Its all about the money money money

Mozza3 · February 06, 2012, 11:01:22 PM

I'd go the Porpoise but only because he's about $120k cheaper.

Dudge · February 06, 2012, 11:04:15 PM

Money says Porps, x factor says Christensen

MC · February 07, 2012, 01:08:51 AM

Neither. Too much risk involved. Are either of them going to improve by 20+ ppg to make them keepers by year's end? Imo no. Better off getting Didak lol ::)

Manbearpig · February 07, 2012, 11:50:50 AM

Quote from: MC on February 07, 2012, 01:08:51 AM
Neither. Too much risk involved. Are either of them going to improve by 20+ ppg to make them keepers by year's end? Imo no.

Christensen could.

Porpz is almost no chance of being a keeper.

Disco · February 07, 2012, 12:02:32 PM

QuoteNeither. Too much risk involved. Are either of them going to improve by 20+ ppg to make them keepers by year's end? Imo no. Better off getting Didak lol

Didaks out for a month so back to the drawing board.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/alan-didak-to-miss-month-after-tearing-adductor-muscle/story-e6frf9jf-1226264321153

Capper · February 07, 2012, 02:01:34 PM

I would rather take a rookie then either of these 2. porps to many injuries and christensen is too expensive for so little score

MC · February 07, 2012, 02:20:55 PM

Quote from: Disco on February 07, 2012, 12:02:32 PM
QuoteNeither. Too much risk involved. Are either of them going to improve by 20+ ppg to make them keepers by year's end? Imo no. Better off getting Didak lol

Didaks out for a month so back to the drawing board.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/alan-didak-to-miss-month-after-tearing-adductor-muscle/story-e6frf9jf-1226264321153

Oh man! There goes the whole team!! Haha

The Bomber · February 10, 2012, 01:47:47 AM

Other than the DPP rookies like pfieffer and tomlinson etc...there arent too many rookie forwards that are under 150k...and those that are there are of the presumably poorer sides of 2012 like Brisbane, Port and GWS...

We all saw what happened to GC last year, forwards basically had none of it, many of the presumed cash cows were in and out of the sides with 40-50 point scores...

That's my reasoning for getting Christensen. Secondly being an X-Factor player helps in SC, positive scaling especially in tight games

tor01doc · February 10, 2012, 01:58:51 AM

'Not a fish but a mammal' is better value than the Cat.

Adelaide's first 6 week draw is so easy he just has to make some cash for the astute supercoach.

Go the Porpoise on purpose.

JSelwood14 · February 10, 2012, 10:17:34 AM

I'd Choose a rookie over this two and use the cash elsewhere.

Gooner · February 10, 2012, 11:15:01 AM

Christensen. He's got a lot more upside and is underpriced because of numerous sub appearances last year.

coolfugitiv0 · February 10, 2012, 12:05:19 PM

Quote from: Disco on February 07, 2012, 12:02:32 PM
QuoteNeither. Too much risk involved. Are either of them going to improve by 20+ ppg to make them keepers by year's end? Imo no. Better off getting Didak lol

Didaks out for a month so back to the drawing board.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/alan-didak-to-miss-month-after-tearing-adductor-muscle/story-e6frf9jf-1226264321153

If you wanted to live dangerously, you could get Didak anyway ;D

burner11 · February 12, 2012, 03:32:45 PM

Porps will play HFF and Midfield, If he stays injury free will be a gun