Mumford or Goldstein for Ruckman? Suggestions?

[Joel20]

I can't decide out of these 2. I am looking for a good consistent 1st Ruckman? Below the 615k mark. Suggestions?

[pavs nose]

i love my mummy

[Joel20]

Still not sure on which to choose, i need some good reasons why i should choose a certain ruckman :)

[Mozza3]

Mummy is number 1 ruck at the Swans by a long way. Apparently he has trimmed down so expect his workrate to lift around the ground. Goldstein is another exciting prospect and the Kangas have an easy draw but with the return of HMAC I expect maybe a sharing of the ruck duties.

[CFC 1979]

Mummy's the lock out of those 2

[Jake8]

Mumford doesn't have as much competition as Goldy.

[Joel20]

Ok i'll be going with Mummy after what i have heard :) thanks for the feedback!

[Big_Cox14]

It's unanimous. 8 - 0 to Mummy!

[Jake8]

Anytime mate  ;)

[pavs nose]

how can you not choose your mummy?

[WillDel]

Ive chosen Mummy and will definitely keep it that way. However he is a little over the top with his tackling. I do remember reading late last year that he was working on his tackle though. Essentially just picking the other player up. Haha

[theta]

Not so cut-and-dry imo. 

While mummy is a 5-10 point better ruckman, Goldstein is more likely to play 22 games - the Swans build their team around mummy and are more likely to rest him through the season with 17-19 games played, especially with seaby and pyke banging on the door.   Yes Hmac, Pederson and Petrie are there for North, but my gut says sydney are more likely to rest mummy.