Is it a risk having 3 GWS Mids?

[Jake8]

I have Coniglio and Shiel already and I am thinking of downgrading Wingard for Macdonald. Is it too risky having 3 GWS mids?

[4820]

a little, but if you think they are the best options take them. Rnd 11 bye may be an issue avoiding 0. 

[upthemaidens]

not really, they are just cannon fodder to make cash,,, u probably would of traded them off by rd.8 or so

[Jake8]

Ok thanks.

[Capper]

not really, they are just cannon fodder to make cash,,, u probably would of traded them off by rd.8 or so

The issue arrises though of how many other players in your mids have byes on R11??

[Jake8]

Also should I swap Wingard or Coniglio for Macdonald?

[Capper]

Also should I swap Wingard or Coniglio for Macdonald?

I would say wingard

[upthemaidens]

not really, they are just cannon fodder to make cash,,, u probably would of traded them off by rd.8 or so

The issue arrises though of how many other players in your mids have byes on R11??

the rookies u start with and the rookies u have at rd. 11 are unlikely to be the same,  so u will trade your way to the correct structure for byes

[Capper]

not really, they are just cannon fodder to make cash,,, u probably would of traded them off by rd.8 or so

The issue arrises though of how many other players in your mids have byes on R11??

the rookies u start with and the rookies u have at rd. 11 are unlikely to be the same,  so u will trade your way to the correct structure for byes

I meant how many mid prems have a bye in R11

[Jake8]

I have no premiums with a byes.

[Peter]

Agree 100 percent with Upthemaidens. Should have minimum of 3.