Which defense is the better bet?

[n.r.i.]

I'm tossing up the makeup of my defense, which do you guys see being more productive?

Defense 1: Goddard, shaw, deledio, grimes, lake, Ellis, mohr

Defense 2: Goddard, deledio, adcock, Broughton, heppell,M Clark, Ellis

I'm not concerned about the bench as this is dependent on nab cup etc
What's everyone's thoughts? Cheers

[Football Factory]

Hard choice i would go defence 2

Defence 1 has riskier players in Grimes and Lake

[stew42]

Option 2, but put in Mohr instead of Marty Clarke

[pavs nose]

I'm tossing up the makeup of my defense, which do you guys see being more productive?

Defense 1: Goddard, shaw, deledio, grimes, lake, Ellis, mohr

Defense 2: Goddard, deledio, adcock, Broughton, heppell,M Clark, Ellis

I'm not concerned about the bench as this is dependent on nab cup etc
What's everyone's thoughts? Cheers

Option 2 but not keen on the cock(adcock). I would put lake in his spot and beef up your mids, rucks or fwds with the extra cash

[Colliwobblers]

I'm tossing up the makeup of my defense, which do you guys see being more productive?

Defense 1: Goddard, shaw, deledio, grimes, lake, Ellis, mohr

Defense 2: Goddard, deledio, adcock, Broughton, heppell,M Clark, Ellis

I'm not concerned about the bench as this is dependent on nab cup etc
What's everyone's thoughts? Cheers

Defence 2 by a fair way with both heppell and clarke against lake and mohr, broughton beats grimes and shaw beats adcock so yeah def 2.

adcock could be hanley?? then adcock might have a much better year this season with his main men fit behind him....