Would Conca be a better option than Shaw?!?!?

Started by mdub, January 23, 2012, 05:34:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

elephants

Conca is currently included in my incredibly mid-price back line right now...

mezzoculo

#46
Quote from: elephants on February 23, 2012, 08:26:51 PM
Conca is currently included in my incredibly mid-price back line right now...
+1
Has been in most of my pre-season teams to date.
Interesting to hear Monty pretty much write him off in the most recent podcast  :o

Windigo

Dunno what to do with my backs.

Waters, Lake, Conca, Duff etc.  ::)

Justin Bieber

Quote from: Windigo on February 23, 2012, 08:35:44 PM
Dunno what to do with my backs.

Waters, Lake, Conca, Duff etc.  ::)

Howard, Hargrave... so many potential mid-pricers.

elephants

Quote from: whatlez on February 23, 2012, 08:38:50 PM
Quote from: Windigo on February 23, 2012, 08:35:44 PM
Dunno what to do with my backs.

Waters, Lake, Conca, Duff etc.  ::)

Howard, Hargrave... so many potential mid-pricers.
May as well add Grimes in there...

SydneyRox

yup, this will be one of the keys to a good season, they wont all go off, so picking the right one or two will set you up really well.

PowerBug

So 7 mid-priced defenders is the new "in" thing is it?? :P

SydneyRox

you could always try that, leave yourself 300-400k in the bank and then make the fix trades after two/three rounds?

A bit risky, and a waste of trades maybe? But a new approach!!

nostradamus

Mid-pricers come with potentially big rewards, but with them come inherent risks. ln my opinion there are only a few that end up being worthwhile picks, to pick them all (or too many of them) almost guarantees failure. l say this because you will select both suceesses and failures, thus negating any advantage you may be after. The real challenge is picking the right one or maybe two out of the many tempting players out there to give yourself the jump on your opposition