Would Conca be a better option than Shaw?!?!?

Capper · February 17, 2012, 11:20:14 PM

Quote from: Doyle on February 17, 2012, 11:12:36 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on January 23, 2012, 10:45:59 PM
be as mad at Shaw as you like and be as optimistic on conca as you like, fact is saw will outscore him by minimum 10, because i have conca as a keeper 7th defender and expect 80-90 out of him, Shaw should average 95. upgrade target for me if he behaves.

7th defender?! Only 2 rookies??

Thats a heavy def

fertalong · February 17, 2012, 11:52:58 PM

Pretty sure he means by year's end

Jukes · February 18, 2012, 01:01:40 AM

Wow Conca as 7th defender, He'd be 5th in my team, yesterday he'd have been 4th! Back rookies are plentiful and should get quite a few.

Scrads · February 18, 2012, 02:25:03 AM

I think he means in his final team, not his initial team...

Windigo · February 18, 2012, 11:34:17 AM

Remember Jetta last year.

SydneyRox · February 18, 2012, 03:32:04 PM

conca could be out for the first five rounds if you believe the papers today

chatters24 · February 18, 2012, 05:38:00 PM

Quote from: SydneyRox on February 18, 2012, 03:32:04 PM
conca could be out for the first five rounds if you believe the papers today

What did he do??

Kuruki · February 18, 2012, 05:44:08 PM

That really stuffs my team up having Conca out if it's true. Back to the drawing board.

Capper · February 18, 2012, 05:44:23 PM

Quote from: chatters24 on February 18, 2012, 05:38:00 PM
Quote from: SydneyRox on February 18, 2012, 03:32:04 PM
conca could be out for the first five rounds if you believe the papers today

What did he do??

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/129123/default.aspx

SydneyRox · February 18, 2012, 06:16:12 PM

did look like a lot, but they are talking somewhere between 2 and 4 now.

elephants · February 18, 2012, 06:18:21 PM

Ugh, Conca was out of my team as soon as I saw the incident. Absolutely zero malice or intent in it (even Adams said it was accidental!) but the tribunal will probably destroy him....

Capper · February 20, 2012, 04:40:34 PM

Quote from: elephants on February 18, 2012, 06:18:21 PM
Ugh, Conca was out of my team as soon as I saw the incident. Absolutely zero malice or intent in it (even Adams said it was accidental!) but the tribunal will probably destroy him....

yeh doesnt look good for him

fertalong · February 20, 2012, 05:07:54 PM

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/129239/default.aspx

According to the AFL website, he is going to get 3 games, but looks like 2 of those include NAB cub matches, so he'll only miss R1. Still a viable option.

mezzoculo · February 20, 2012, 05:15:06 PM

Quote from: fertalong on February 20, 2012, 05:07:54 PM
According to the AFL website, he is going to get 3 games, but looks like 2 of those include NAB cub matches, so he'll only miss R1. Still a viable option.

This is the para from that article:
"If he accepts the offer, he will be able to play in round one of the home and away season, but if the 19-year-old fights the rough conduct charge at the tribunal and loses he faces a four-week ban. "

SydneyRox · February 20, 2012, 05:16:19 PM

Quote from: fertalong on February 20, 2012, 05:07:54 PM
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/129239/default.aspx

According to the AFL website, he is going to get 3 games, but looks like 2 of those include NAB cub matches, so he'll only miss R1. Still a viable option.

Did you read the article? He has been offered 3 games, reduced to 2 if he pleads early which means he will PLAY round 1 of the normal season?