COMBINATIONS

[DT-SC]

i think combo one because:
* beams will easily outscore mumford if he isn't injured(capable of 105+ average IMO)
*Mcintosh should out score conca
*if broughton doesn't get a lock down role (which he shouldn't - inclusions of dawson will help his cause) he will average nearly as much as cloke.
* a little more money left over   ;D

what are your thoughts?

[dmac07]

Cloke and beams will score similar, both a little up and down with scoring.

Broughton should ave 10 points more than conca.

Imo, mumford will outscore hmac by 15 points a game. Not sold on hmac as an option, he will be the number 2 ruck behind goldy, and number 2 forward behind petrie. Will have some good games but could see some very low scores if not given substantial ruck time as he is not a proven regular goalkicker.

So option 2 for me, cloke, conca and mumford.

[TheMailman]

yeah I would reckon that option 2 is the proper way to go.

Can't you replace Conca with someone cheaper/with more scoring potential.

The risks lie with Beams and Hmac in option 1 while in option 2 the only real risk is Conca

[Colliwobblers]

Yeah tough choice, i went option 2 for the safety of the premium ruck. But i think conca will rip it up this year should average at least 70, he will be a mid this season remember not a lock down defender. But if lake fires up in nab cup he is anotehr option is you get scared off conca at that price. I would prefer and mid/fwd than a KPP fwd as good as cloke is too hey cant knock cloke after 2011.

[Ziplock]

cloke broughts and hmac