Franchise Carnival Discussion

[Master Q]

[roo boys!]

I reckon RB you will also need the pitch to be sticky or cumbling so that you can bowl them out very quickly then chase it down quickly ;)

Who says my bowlers can't do that on a flat? :P ;)

[bomberboy0618]

LOL you're all such sooks :P

I agree.
Q was that picture referring to PB's post or his time on FF in general?

[Master Q]

LOL you're all such sooks :P

I agree.
Q was that picture referring to PB's post or his time on FF in general?

Both

[PowerBug]

LOL you're all such sooks :P

I agree.
Q was that picture referring to PB's post or his time on FF in general?

Both

Thanks mate appreciate it. ;) But you clearly stated the obvious that was also mentioned plenty of times beforehand just in different writing. ::)

[bomberboy0618]

Can someone clarify why NRR shouldn't be allowed to decide a final?

[Master Q]

Can someone clarify why NRR shouldn't be allowed to decide a final?

Because PB's team know they will lose if it comes to that.

[PowerBug]

Can someone clarify why NRR shouldn't be allowed to decide a final?

No reason at all bb, that's what we decided on, and that's what we are using. Nails just made a suggestion, that's all. He should've made it earlier. ;D

[bomberboy0618]

Can someone clarify why NRR shouldn't be allowed to decide a final?

Because PB's team know they will lose if it comes to that.

Ahh.
I personally would replay the round but make sure that noone made any transfers to strengthen their team. But that's me.

[roo boys!]

Can someone clarify why NRR shouldn't be allowed to decide a final?

Because PB's team know they will lose if it comes to that.

Ahh.
I personally would replay the round but make sure that noone made any transfers to strengthen their team. But that's me.

Those three words are just a different way of saying "Do the complete opposite" :P

[Nails]

Can someone clarify why NRR shouldn't be allowed to decide a final?

Because PB's team know they will lose if it comes to that.

Ahh.
I personally would replay the round but make sure that noone made any transfers to strengthen their team. But that's me.

Those three words are just a different way of saying "Do the complete opposite" :P

They don't use NRR in real cricket, they don't even use NRR in ftp to decide a final.

It's like Collingwood v.s. Saints Grand Final, "Collingwood scored more points in the 1st quarter so they win"

I think it should come down to whichever franchise lost the least wickets, as it's done on FTP.

And no PB, it wasn't agreed that this would be the final decider IMO, it was decided for who would go through to the final, if the other two franchises tied, not if the final was tied.

[CrowsFan]

Ok nails we can do it on least wickets lost.

That means the final game doesn't even need to be played. PBP has lost 43 wickets compared to WAY's 31 wickets lost.

Congrats we win ;D

[DazBurg]

Ok nails we can do it on least wickets lost.

That means the final game doesn't even need to be played. PBP has lost 43 wickets compared to WAY's 31 wickets lost.

Congrats we win ;D

Snap!
LOL

[Nails]

Ok nails we can do it on least wickets lost.

That means the final game doesn't even need to be played. PBP has lost 43 wickets compared to WAY's 31 wickets lost.

Congrats we win ;D

Snap!
LOL

Good. Congrats on your win :)

I don't care if we win or not, I just wanted it to be decided on something other than bs NRR.

[Master Q]

Well I'm happy to do least wickets lost... We win no matter what  :P

I'd prefer NRR as it means the final game actually has a point...