Combos

[theflyinghawk]

Not sure which one would give a better balance, what do you think?

[picker_man]

willbe hard to determine when it comes to balance without seeing the rest of your team
but docherty may not play early has a hip problem, porplyzia has never been a good dt scorer and injury prone
Even though grimes is injury prone the first option gives you two guys who could score well compared to one in the second

[elephants]

GGC for me.

[Pickle]

Agree GGC although don't like either combos to be honest...

[theflyinghawk]

GGC=
DEF: B. Goddard, B. Deledio, J. Adcock, D. Heppell, B. Lake, M. Clarke, Morris* (B. Smedts, B. Wilkes)
MID: D. Swan, G. Ablett jnr, S. Thompson, M. Barlow, D. Shiel, K. Stevens (J. McDonald, S. Kerridge)
RUC: M. Leuenberger, S. Mumford (J. Giles, O. Stephenson)
FWD: L. Franklin, D. Zaharakis, D. Martin, S. Sidebottom, J. Brown, J. Porplyzia, A. Treloar (T. Walsh, D. Zorko)
CASH LEFT: $2,200
*Morris instead of docherty

DMP=
DEF: B. Goddard, B. Deledio, J. Adcock, D. Heppell, J. Grimes, B. Lake, M. Clarke (S. Morris, B. Smedts)
MID: D. Swan, G. Ablett jnr, S. Thompson, M. Barlow, D. Shiel, K. Stevens (J. McDonald, S. Kerridge)
RUC: M. Leuenberger, J. Giles (A. Pattison, O. Stephenson)
FWD: L. Franklin, D. Zaharakis, D. Martin, S. Sidebottom, A. Christensen, J. Brown, A. Treloar (T. Walsh, D. Zorko)
2k left

[maanco]

sorry, i don't like either combo

[picker_man]

WoW that first team is so similiar to mine :P   i dont have lake, clarke, porplyzia or swan but identical otherwise so of course im going to be byest as say take the 1st team with mumford ect and it looks to have better structure
so now ive seen the teams id change my vote if i could

[Colliwobblers]

GGC and team 1 obviously for me, i dont like the 3 rookie rucks strategy, could cost you a lot of points before you ever make the points up through the extra coin you make or from a potentially better player elsewhere.

nice job on T1 by the way.

[maanco]

there's too much risk in #1 and i dont think there's enough value in #2

[Colliwobblers]

there's too much risk in #1 and i dont think there's enough value in #2

Yeah well i would downgrade porps to a rook, and watch lake through nab cup, if he doesnt shine conca might or use porps money to make him grimes or waters if they shine, brown with a full preseason for the first time in ages is not a risk IMO, he might not break 90 but at that price thats fine, and i dont see anything else in team 1 to call a risk??

[theflyinghawk]

obviously a lot depends on nab.
to be honest porps is there just so i have 100k stashed away for when i decide i need it, probably to upgrade lake if he doesnt get up.

btw colli you've managed to rack up over 600 posts in like 20 days thats a fair effort hahaha

[Colliwobblers]

obviously a lot depends on nab.
to be honest porps is there just so i have 100k stashed away for when i decide i need it, probably to upgrade lake if he doesnt get up.

btw colli you've managed to rack up over 600 posts in like 20 days thats a fair effort hahaha

LOL yeah, well I have been on holidays, back to work this week so you will see the posts slow down a lot, but im loving the site and the people so im here to stay and cant wait for the upcoming season.

I knew about dt talk last season and found this site this preseason and loving monty for it, but not just him like i said its all the people that make it great.

And as for your team which this thread is about, you got nothingto worry about. As you say watch nab cup for the form guide, ive also got adcock too, but if broughton gets the right role ill be over to him in a hearbeat, a lot of choices depend on the cup so bring it on already!