Matthew Kreuzer

[Andrew]

A real shame this bloke isn't DPP, I think we'd all be talking about him if so. But he'll end up being at least 10pts a game under the top ruckman this year, probably more like 25. In other words, he'll likely cost you a trade down the line (as someone noted above) or leave you trailing behind. Not for me.

[Windigo]

Too many question marks and has never been a great dt scorer.

3 tons from 60 odd games. Not for me.

[Off Tap]

Too many question marks and has never been a great dt scorer.

3 tons from 60 odd games. Not for me.

+1.

[pavs nose]

Too many question marks and has never been a great dt scorer.

3 tons from 60 odd games. Not for me.

+1.

-1. Big men take time to develop plus this guy has had a knee reco. C'mon big Marty make these Kent's eat their words

[Colliwobblers]

the tough question is and you need a big pair of aggots, will the mid priced rucks score you much less than the premiums = keepers, or will the rookie rucks score you much less than the mid pricers = go the rooks.

ill be going guns or rooks, and ill only pick a mid priced player as a keepr, unless he is approx 150k or less and can be used as a cash cow at worst, in rucks this means hmac only pretty much.

so this means is kruezer a keeper, if not go a rook or go a gun . right ?

[WEEEagles]

Kreuzer should get 85-95. Not a bad backup ruckman.

[Colliwobblers]

Kreuzer should get 85-95. Not a bad backup ruckman.

forget back up thats a good starting ruckman :)

[Windigo]

Zac Smith did better than him in his first year.....

[Andrew]

If he shows some NAB Cup form, I could save $110k on Jacobs and start with Kreuzer... but too many scores around the 60 mark.