Martin and Beams.

Started by Cookie Monster, December 19, 2011, 06:59:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Cookie Monster

Dustin Martin and Dayne Beams maybe midfield/fowards next year.

Source? the Supercoach page on facebook, http://www.facebook.com/supercoach


First look at positions and prices tomorrow on Superfooty.

valkorum

superfooty just tweeted the same thing.

Holz

this is stupid i can make a team with essentially no forwards in it.

Beams, Martin, Sidebottom, Fyfe, Robinson

so many F/M now, gibbs better stay a back because if he is purely a mid and these guys are getting DPP than its stupid

dubizzy


Torpedo10

Any news on when we will find out prices and positions of DT?

BGK

Quote from: Torpedo10 on December 19, 2011, 07:58:06 PM
Any news on when we will find out prices and positions of DT?

Maybe you should open the link.

BGK

Quote from: Holzman on December 19, 2011, 07:26:13 PM
this is stupid i can make a team with essentially no forwards in it.

Beams, Martin, Sidebottom, Fyfe, Robinson

so many F/M now, gibbs better stay a back because if he is purely a mid and these guys are getting DPP than its stupid

I have to agree with you Holz. It's an absolute joke if Beams and Martin a DPP and Gibbs isnt.

meow meow

Martin was in the top 25 goalkickers in the league in 2011 so it's not that stupid.

BGK

Quote from: meow meow on December 19, 2011, 08:30:22 PM
Martin was in the top 25 goalkickers in the league in 2011 so it's not that stupid.

It's not necessarily the fact that he is a DPP it's more that we have so many really good forward ones and a massive hole in the backs. should all the top 25 DPP be M/F?

BGK

I just had a look at the top goal scoters. The only one worth mentioning who kicked 1 less goal but had more shots on goal is Dane Swan. If Martin is MPP surely Swan should be

meow meow

Swan is a goalkicking mid. Martin played in the forward line for large patches this year. Big difference.

It's bizarre that Swan is a 2-time AA half forward flank.

Beams should be mid only.

Maca24

They are making SC way to easy now...
Reasons being..
1. So many MPP options now that seem quite ridicolous to me.
2. Reversible Trades
3. 24 trades even though the byes are virtually gone


bowyanger

Quote from: Maca24 on December 19, 2011, 09:15:35 PM
They are making SC way to easy now...
Reasons being..
1. So many MPP options now that seem quite ridicolous to me.
2. Reversible Trades
3. 24 trades even though the byes are virtually gone
Yeah reversible trades should be red flagged

BGK

I'm not sure that 24 trades is horrible. Without the extra trades there is no way to at least try and avoid some donuts.

Holz

Quote from: Maca24 on December 19, 2011, 09:15:35 PM
They are making SC way to easy now...
Reasons being..
1. So many MPP options now that seem quite ridicolous to me.
2. Reversible Trades
3. 24 trades even though the byes are virtually gone

i agree with the first 2 but byes virtually gone, we are forced to use 6 trades to avoid donuts and we will still probably have some