Main Menu

Australia v India v Sri Lanka

Started by Master Q, December 12, 2011, 06:54:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

bomberboy0618

If anyone thinks that Tendulkar is better than Bradman then you need to empty your head of the rocks that fill them.

upthemaidens

me thinks they will replace lyon with harris for perth

Maca24

Kallis is crap. Most selfish player to walk on the planet.

c4v3m4n


Maca24


PowerBug

You say Kallis is bad???? I think his record says enough don't you??

I think Cowan for Watson is likely for the third test, assuming Watto is fit. Hopefully we se Khawaja back in the side, and Harris might come in too as the pitch is usually very hard in Perth.

When watching some of the game, i noticed that Pattinson is a very arrogant fellow, he seems to have a very short temper and gets annoyed when things don't go his way. He won't have much of a test career if he is to act badly on the field.

Cicjose

young arrogance is what this team has been missing

pyronerd

Quote from: Cicjose on January 06, 2012, 06:41:03 PM
young arrogance is what this team has been missing
Yes when the experienced guys were the ones who won us the test match ::)

Cicjose

that was an anomaly.

im not changing my stance to suit your agenda

PowerBug

Also nice to see Ponting and Hussey score runs, both showing why they are in the team for the first time in a while. Now they need to back it up. Especially Ponting as Hussey not that long ago got 3 MOTM  awards against Sri Lanka in Sri Lanka.

bomberboy0618

Quote from: Cicjose on January 06, 2012, 06:48:12 PM
that was an anomaly.

im not changing my stance to suit your agenda
Yes, 329 is an anomly. The three most experienced batsmen in the team all making 100s- an anomly. My mistake. Sorry for actually thinking that success shows you are good, but it is actually an anomaly.

Maca24

Kallis's record is that good, because he bats for his average and not for the team.
Surely I'm not the only one with this opinion?

Cicjose

Quote from: bomberboy0618 on January 06, 2012, 07:13:59 PM
Quote from: Cicjose on January 06, 2012, 06:48:12 PM
that was an anomaly.

im not changing my stance to suit your agenda
Yes, 329 is an anomly. The three most experienced batsmen in the team all making 100s- an anomly. My mistake. Sorry for actually thinking that success shows you are good, but it is actually an anomaly.

since when have all three performed together at the same time??????

pyronerd

Quote from: Cicjose on January 06, 2012, 07:30:45 PM
Quote from: bomberboy0618 on January 06, 2012, 07:13:59 PM
Quote from: Cicjose on January 06, 2012, 06:48:12 PM
that was an anomaly.

im not changing my stance to suit your agenda
Yes, 329 is an anomly. The three most experienced batsmen in the team all making 100s- an anomly. My mistake. Sorry for actually thinking that success shows you are good, but it is actually an anomaly.

since when have all three performed together at the same time??????
If you have 3 top class experienced batsmen they are bound to all perform together eventually, this isn't an anomaly

My Chumps

Quote from: Maca24 on January 06, 2012, 07:28:33 PM
Kallis's record is that good, because he bats for his average and not for the team.
Surely I'm not the only one with this opinion?
You are  :P
I rate him as one of the best cricketers of all time.
I mean, he's got the 12 best test average of all time, and he bowls pretty darn well with an average of 32.
2nd best all rounder to ever play the game behind Gary Sobers.