Australia v India v Sri Lanka

[upthemaidens]

Indias bowling crap. Not totally a batters wicket.. there is a bit of cut of the pitch for seamers and a few patches for spinners to land in. India just to retarded and keep bowling short lol.

sure theres alittle in the wicket, but really once a good bat gets their eye in, they should make a big score. 400 really should be around par

[Barlow 21]

Indias bowling crap. Not totally a batters wicket.. there is a bit of cut of the pitch for seamers and a few patches for spinners to land in. India just to retarded and keep bowling short lol.

sure theres alittle in the wicket, but really once a good bat gets their eye in, they should make a big score. 400 really should be around par

400 is a great score on pretty much any pitch. I'd say par would be 330-360 but with India's batting lineup, you'd be wanting 380+.

[Maca24]

300 par I reckon. 400 as par is a bit iinflated lol  :P

[upthemaidens]

yeah well i can see a good batting performance being in the 500+ area on this pitch. so i dont know, if they get 350 i think india will have done a good job

[upthemaidens]

300 par I reckon. 400 as par is a bit iinflated lol  :P

300  haha i think thats going abit low,  india would take 300 right now,,  but no i think 400 is pretty much right.

[Maca24]

300 par I reckon. 400 as par is a bit iinflated lol  :P

300  haha i think thats going abit low,  india would take 300 right now,,  but no i think 400 is pretty much right.

Wouldnt that make it par then?  :P
Your contradicting yourself.

[upthemaidens]

300 par I reckon. 400 as par is a bit iinflated lol  :P

300  haha i think thats going abit low,  india would take 300 right now,,  but no i think 400 is pretty much right.

Wouldnt that make it par then?  :P
Your contradicting yourself.

no cause i think they would take 350 aswell,,  hey i think the wicket is pretty safe, its just my opinion.
  but if you want to be confrontational about it be may guest

[Maca24]

300 par I reckon. 400 as par is a bit iinflated lol  :P

300  haha i think thats going abit low,  india would take 300 right now,,  but no i think 400 is pretty much right.

Wouldnt that make it par then?  :P
Your contradicting yourself.

no cause i think they would take 350 aswell,,  hey i think the wicket is pretty safe, its just my opinion.
  but if you want to be confrontational about it be may guest

I'm not trying to be confrontational mate.
Just saying my opinion..

[upthemaidens]

300 par I reckon. 400 as par is a bit iinflated lol  :P

300  haha i think thats going abit low,  india would take 300 right now,,  but no i think 400 is pretty much right.

Wouldnt that make it par then?  :P
Your contradicting yourself.

no cause i think they would take 350 aswell,,  hey i think the wicket is pretty safe, its just my opinion.
  but if you want to be confrontational about it be may guest

I'm not trying to be confrontational mate.
Just saying my opinion..

ok cool,  par would be what BOTH teams would take. i think india would take 350 but aussies wouldn't,  also i think aussies would take over 400 , but indians wouldn't

[upthemaidens]

ICC need to make DRS compulsary,  this is a friggin joke

[CrowsFan]

Yeah pretty stupid that decision.
I was saying at home this moring that it is stupid that they can choose whether it can be used or not

[BratPack]

STILL A KNOB!

[CrowsFan]

And here comes the Aussie collapse... :-\

[upthemaidens]

jesus cowan wasnt out either

[Ringo]

Again as usual