beams and sidebottom

starz · December 03, 2011, 12:42:35 PM

just wondering what peoples thoughts are about beams chances as being listed as forward/ centre

also does anyone know the chances of sidebottom going into a full time midfield role

Turkies · December 03, 2011, 01:27:27 PM

Both locked IF also listed as a fwd. Harvs has said he wants to work with both of them to develop them as midfielders. It will be tough for both of them to crack into the mid though. There are better options for the midfield i think, but if they get the FWD DPP then its a lock for sure.

starz · December 03, 2011, 01:50:08 PM

Yeh thanks mate I'm with you will only consider if named in fwds. But do you think they will take the next step. I know I have heard beams saying that he wants to play more midfield. Don't know about side bot, thoughts???

Turkies · December 03, 2011, 03:04:53 PM

Steele would love to play in the mid, no doubt, but I think beams will spend more time in there next year. I think both will step up, but with beams having a bit of an injury interrupted season and still averaging 100, he could achieve premium mid status of 110+ whereas I don't think sidebottom can push past 100 next year unless he is getting loads of time through the middle

starz · December 03, 2011, 04:33:23 PM

What do you think as a rough estimate the chance of both being named fwds

Torpedo10 · December 03, 2011, 04:37:53 PM

I doubt Beams will be a Fwd. I think Sidebottom will be named as a Mid/Fwd. The chance of Beams being a Fwd is around 20%.

Voldemort · December 04, 2011, 02:18:31 AM

No and no.

Nuff said

Speculator · December 04, 2011, 12:21:58 PM

Beams is a much more attractive option for mine, but sidey is definitely on the radar, however as others have said only if they are forwards

Doyle · December 04, 2011, 02:24:01 PM

Beams isn't in the top 5 mid fielders at the Pies (Swan, Pendlebury, Thomas, Ball, Johnson). If he's an MPP, then there is time for consideration but otherwise, it is unfortunately a no. Sidebottom was never an option (for me) anyway.

CuStArDaRm · December 04, 2011, 03:00:02 PM

Neither are fantasy relavant at there price. If they came into a season after being injured at a bottom price I would pick them but only then.

Ziplock · December 04, 2011, 04:05:55 PM

mmm, I see them as relevant, as said, if named as fwds/ dpps, but as pure mids... I think there are better options, and for cheaper as well in some cases.

elephants · December 04, 2011, 04:46:11 PM

Both are on my radar if named as forward/mids.

starz · December 04, 2011, 05:14:27 PM

Yeh that's what I think elephants. I think beams could be a bit unique by the fct that he is so pricey.

I'm thinking sidebottom is a lot more chance in being named as a forward then beams though. I won't consider beams if not named as a forward.

Also I have a funny feeling bartel might be named as a fwd

DT Gun · December 05, 2011, 08:48:27 PM

both very fantasy relevant. up and coming kids on the block and sidebottom will been given more midfield time in 2012. so he averaged 86 plus more midfield time, if forward he is an absolute steal. Beams is the same

Doyle · December 05, 2011, 11:09:56 PM

Quote from: DT Gun on December 05, 2011, 08:48:27 PM
both very fantasy relevant. up and coming kids on the block and sidebottom will been given more midfield time in 2012. so he averaged 86 plus more midfield time, if forward he is an absolute steal. Beams is the same

'sidebottom will been given more midfield time in 2012'

Are you the coach of the Pies or something ::)

Where's the proof behind this statement?

beams and sidebottom

Voldemort