World 15 Discussion

[Nails]

The thing is...

flower me you lot overrate Steele massively. He had half a season where he was good.

Only 96.1 average over last 10 H&A games as he started to get less mid time and more forward time. This will increase again next year once Luke Ball comes back. Though Wellingham leaving makes it more questionable...

94.38 average over his last 13 games total.

Therefore bb is getting in good young talent and similar old talent to keep him competitive this year... which is what you're complaining about, him not being competitive this year...

What he's doing is trading Steele when he's worth the most as he won't be this good next year IMO. Buy Low, Sell High ;)

[Maca24]

The thing is...

flower me you lot overrate Steele massively. He had half a season where he was good.

Only 96.1 average over last 10 H&A games as he started to get less mid time and more forward time. This will increase again next year once Luke Ball comes back. Though Wellingham leaving makes it more questionable...

94.38 average over his last 13 games total.

Therefore bb is getting in good young talent and similar old talent to keep him competitive this year... which is what you're complaining about, him not being competitive this year...

What he's doing is trading Steele when he's worth the most as he won't be this good next year IMO. Buy Low, Sell High ;)

I agree completely!
I can see why he is getting rid of his better players, because he is getting lots in return! Sidebottom is good sure, thats why I want him. But as Nails said he may not be as good as some of you are rating him. I know what I've bought, and Ive paid the correct amount.

[ossie85]

Crazy.

Averages of players 22 years old or less

Steele Sidebottom   104.04
Jack Redden   102.82
Harley Bennell   97.55
Toby Greene   94.63
Andrew Gaff   91.17
Nat Fyfe   90.64
Clancee Pearce   89.92
Dustin Martin   88.50
Luke Breust   87.92
Mitch Wallis   87.32


Yeah, massively overrated.



@Maca, of course you think you got a great deal. I see why you desperately needed Steele, what with the state your team is in. I forgot, you're giving up 3 players who weren't in your Premiership 15 for him :/


@Boomz, horrible precedent isn't. Sacking someone for making stupid coaching decisions and damaging the competition. Wouldn't want people sacked for that.

[Boomz]

Crazy.

Averages of players 22 years old or less

Steele Sidebottom   104.04
Jack Redden   102.82
Harley Bennell   97.55
Toby Greene   94.63
Andrew Gaff   91.17
Nat Fyfe   90.64
Clancee Pearce   89.92
Dustin Martin   88.50
Luke Breust   87.92
Mitch Wallis   87.32


Yeah, massively overrated.



@Maca, of course you think you got a great deal. I see why you desperately needed Steele, what with the state your team is in. I forgot, you're giving up 3 players who weren't in your Premiership 15 for him :/


@Boomz, horrible precedent isn't. Sacking someone for making stupid coaching decisions and damaging the competition. Wouldn't want people sacked for that.

Decisions that everyone had a say in & didn't stop them.

[ossie85]

Decisions that everyone had a say in & didn't stop them.

Exactly Boomz. This is why I have to jump up and down to try and bring things back, because a lot of you are making terrible decisions.

I've tried being quiet, assuming that many of you would respect the competition, but a lot of you are intent of winning at all costs, or just being plain apathetic. Completely disrespectful of the work many of us have put it.

[Maca24]

I havent meant to disrespect anyone with my team. :/

[Nails]

Crazy.

Averages of players 22 years old or less

Steele Sidebottom   104.04
Jack Redden   102.82
Harley Bennell   97.55
Toby Greene   94.63
Andrew Gaff   91.17
Nat Fyfe   90.64
Clancee Pearce   89.92
Dustin Martin   88.50
Luke Breust   87.92
Mitch Wallis   87.32


Yeah, massively overrated.



@Maca, of course you think you got a great deal. I see why you desperately needed Steele, what with the state your team is in. I forgot, you're giving up 3 players who weren't in your Premiership 15 for him :/


@Boomz, horrible precedent isn't. Sacking someone for making stupid coaching decisions and damaging the competition. Wouldn't want people sacked for that.

You didn't even list the number 1 22yo and younger average... You're acting like Steele is no.1 when Beams who is 22yo averages 122...

[Holz]

You didn't even list the number 1 22yo and younger average... You're acting like Steele is no.1 when Beams who is 22yo averages 122...

Probably under 22. As redden and sidey are both 21.

[Nails]

He clearly said 22yo or less.

[ossie85]

He clearly said 22yo or less.

If you are 22 years old 5 months old, you are over 22. But I'll change it to 21 if it will appease you Nails

[Nails]

And to lighten the mood:

[Nails]

He clearly said 22yo or less.

If you are 22 years old 5 months old, you are over 22. But I'll change it to 21 if it will appease you Nails

Because when you're 18 year old and 2 weeks and someone says "how old are you"

You don't reply "well, I'm 18 and 2 weeks, so technically that makes me over 18, and if someone was to list people who are 18 years old and younger they would not include me in that list despite the fact that generally I refer to myself as an 18 year old"

[ossie85]

He clearly said 22yo or less.

If you are 22 years old 5 months old, you are over 22. But I'll change it to 21 if it will appease you Nails

Because when you're 18 year old and 2 weeks and someone says "how old are you"

You don't reply "well, I'm 18 and 2 weeks, so technically that makes me over 18, and if someone was to list people who are 18 years old and younger they would not include me in that list despite the fact that generally I refer to myself as an 18 year old"

lol, so when you go to a pub, and they ask you if you're over 18, and you're 18 years 11 months, you say no?

[Nails]

He clearly said 22yo or less.

If you are 22 years old 5 months old, you are over 22. But I'll change it to 21 if it will appease you Nails

Because when you're 18 year old and 2 weeks and someone says "how old are you"

You don't reply "well, I'm 18 and 2 weeks, so technically that makes me over 18, and if someone was to list people who are 18 years old and younger they would not include me in that list despite the fact that generally I refer to myself as an 18 year old"

lol, so when you go to a pub, and they ask you if you're over 18, and you're 18 years 11 months, you say no?

Do you say an 18 year old is not an 18 year old?

So anyone who is 22 years old but 22 years old and 1 day+ is not 22 years old?

You said 22 years old and under... Therefore Beams should be counted. You're 22 years old until you turn 23.

[ossie85]

He clearly said 22yo or less.

If you are 22 years old 5 months old, you are over 22. But I'll change it to 21 if it will appease you Nails

Because when you're 18 year old and 2 weeks and someone says "how old are you"

You don't reply "well, I'm 18 and 2 weeks, so technically that makes me over 18, and if someone was to list people who are 18 years old and younger they would not include me in that list despite the fact that generally I refer to myself as an 18 year old"

lol, so when you go to a pub, and they ask you if you're over 18, and you're 18 years 11 months, you say no?

Do you say an 18 year old is not an 18 year old?

So anyone who is 22 years old but 22 years old and 1 day+ is not 22 years old?

You said 22 years old and under... Therefore Beams should be counted. You're 22 years old until you turn 23.

As I said, think of it as 21 years, 364 days or under.