Michael Barlow

Started by elephants, November 09, 2011, 01:34:53 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

What will Barlow average in 2012?

Above 115
112-115
108-111
104-107
100-103
Below 100

MGK1

110+ is a realistic expection. Would take 105+ at his price.

Tom_16

Quote from: Windigo on January 29, 2012, 10:18:54 PM
I'd say 105+. Not being greedy.
+1 105 would be great and anything more would be excellent.

Ziplock


Tom_16

Quote from: Ziplock on January 30, 2012, 01:24:31 AM
I can see 110+ tbh.
Yeah if he's fully fit i don't see why he wouldn't avg 110+, 2010 is proof of that.

stew42

2010 was two years ago... Nah screw it, he has the skills  :)

SydneyRox

Without palmer in the team, this guy is a lock.

TheMailman


Matt_352


stew42

Can't  believe I'm writing these words...

Barlow out, Gibbs in. Bring it!

Windigo

Quote from: stew42 on January 31, 2012, 10:36:31 AM
Can't  believe I'm writing these words...

Barlow out, Gibbs in. Bring it!

I don't see why not mate. Everyone has this love affair with Barlow from a couple of years back. Gibbs could explode this year. Don't let people tell you otherwise.  ;)


stew42

Quote from: Windigo on January 31, 2012, 10:42:00 AM
Quote from: stew42 on January 31, 2012, 10:36:31 AM
Can't  believe I'm writing these words...

Barlow out, Gibbs in. Bring it!

I don't see why not mate. Everyone has this love affair with Barlow from a couple of years back. Gibbs could explode this year. Don't let people tell you otherwise.  ;)
Booyeah, I feel empowered!!!

8hours 27 mins left, ladies and gents!

Holz

Quote from: stew42 on January 31, 2012, 10:36:31 AM
Can't  believe I'm writing these words...

Barlow out, Gibbs in. Bring it!

not stupid im probably going both, i might even remove swan for Gibbs if i have too

lolrocket

Now I didn't do DT in 2010 which might have something to do with this, but is Barlow the lock that everybody is making him out to be?

The new shiny website has sparked my brain into action and now I am starting to properly take notice of all these extra options.

Trengove, Sloane, Shuey, Smith and Vince are all in a similar price range. Don't get me wrong, Barlow is an awesome proposition. But is he really so much better than all these others that 95% of teams should take him instead?

Now someone sane come and convince me about Barlow again

Chelskiman


kilbluff1985

not in my team but Curnow could be a smokie normally Walker wins the time trial at Carlton but Curnow beat him