Main Menu

Harry Potter Fans

Started by Cicjose, October 26, 2011, 10:56:04 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ziplock

Quote from: Holzman on October 27, 2011, 12:15:29 AM
Quote from: CrowsFan on October 27, 2011, 12:08:12 AM
That end bit they just had to chuck in cos it was also in the book. Thought it was lame then too, but was done to show they ended up with each other blah blah blah

i think its more who hermoine ends up with, you watch the film and it makes no sense, in the book its believable

I havent seen the movie... did they change it?!?!?!

omfg. It's totally malfoy isnt it. Don't lie.

ossie85


Ziplock

I heard she just grabbed dumbledores old wand and went to town on it.

Holz

Quote from: Ziplock on October 27, 2011, 08:30:35 AM
Quote from: Holzman on October 27, 2011, 12:15:29 AM
Quote from: CrowsFan on October 27, 2011, 12:08:12 AM
That end bit they just had to chuck in cos it was also in the book. Thought it was lame then too, but was done to show they ended up with each other blah blah blah

i think its more who hermoine ends up with, you watch the film and it makes no sense, in the book its believable

I havent seen the movie... did they change it?!?!?!

omfg. It's totally malfoy isnt it. Don't lie.

same as the book, i just ment the way ron in the movie its portrayed makes it a bit unrealistic.

Voldemort

#19
the movie was fairly captivating, easily the best movie of them all

the worst one in my opinion was the 5th one, they didn't even get many of the things that happened in the book! Although they have an excuse- the book has 700 and something pages  8)

ossie85

Quote from: Voldemort on October 27, 2011, 09:16:22 AM
the movies was fairly captivating, easily the best movie of them all

the worst one in my opinion was the 5th one, they didn't even get many of the things that happened in the book! Although they have an excuse- the book has 700 and something pages  8)

I liked the books, wasn't a huge fan of the movies. IMO, the only movie that stood up was the Third one.

The others to me were only good if you already had read the books, and already had connections with the characters. The third movie was clever in its own right and hit the right emotional notes.

The first two movies were a bit too silly. Movies 4-6 missed out of a heap of stuff but failed to compensate (the makers needed to watch the LotR to show them how its done).

And movies and 7 and 8 were harmed by the ridicolous decision to split them in the middle. The first part didn't have an ending, and the second one didn't have a beginning - either in story, action or emotion. Damn money-grubbing movie execs :(

I enjoyed them all! But as movies they weren't great. The books were - #4 my favourite for the record.

PowerBug

I followed Harry Potter from the start like most of us, and when the thing about Snape came up in the final one, that made all the pieces come together. Also when he died, believe it or not, i nearly cried. :'(

ossie85

Quote from: PowerBug on October 27, 2011, 10:21:51 AM
I followed Harry Potter from the start like most of us, and when the thing about Snape came up in the final one, that made all the pieces come together. Also when he died, believe it or not, i nearly cried. :'(

I imagine Port supporters are use to crying.

Voldemort

Quote from: PowerBug on October 27, 2011, 10:21:51 AM
I followed Harry Potter from the start like most of us, and when the thing about Snape came up in the final one, that made all the pieces come together. Also when he died, believe it or not, i nearly cried. :'(

................................................

Quote from: ossie85 on October 27, 2011, 09:25:34 AM
Quote from: Voldemort on October 27, 2011, 09:16:22 AM
the movies was fairly captivating, easily the best movie of them all

the worst one in my opinion was the 5th one, they didn't even get many of the things that happened in the book! Although they have an excuse- the book has 700 and something pages  8)

I liked the books, wasn't a huge fan of the movies. IMO, the only movie that stood up was the Third one.

The others to me were only good if you already had read the books, and already had connections with the characters. The third movie was clever in its own right and hit the right emotional notes.

The first two movies were a bit too silly. Movies 4-6 missed out of a heap of stuff but failed to compensate (the makers needed to watch the LotR to show them how its done).

And movies and 7 and 8 were harmed by the ridicolous decision to split them in the middle. The first part didn't have an ending, and the second one didn't have a beginning - either in story, action or emotion. Damn money-grubbing movie execs :(

I enjoyed them all! But as movies they weren't great. The books were - #4 my favourite for the record.

Yeah, massive fan of the books, read them all atleast 10 times. Books are way, way better than the movies

Cicjose

there is one exception voldy

CrowsFan

Quote from: Cicjose on October 27, 2011, 05:58:00 PM
there is one exception voldy
No there isn't.
Every book was better than the movie made from it

Voldemort

Quote from: Cicjose on October 27, 2011, 05:58:00 PM
there is one exception voldy

na mate, all the books are better than their movie counter parts

Cicjose

you obviously never read shawshank redemption

CrowsFan

Quote from: Cicjose on October 27, 2011, 06:47:12 PM
you obviously never read shawshank redemption
We are talking about Harry Potter. What has Shawshank got to do with anything?

Cicjose