FTP Setting Tactics

[cookie311993]

rating 160k alot of managers take everything into account and i have seen some teams scout out their opposition alot more in a league where everyone rates 160k fighting for the 1 promotion spot

[Master Q]

Just stating my opinion Fletch  ;)

rating 160k alot of managers take everything into account and i have seen some teams scout out their opposition alot more in a league where everyone rates 160k fighting for the 1 promotion spot

So?

[cookie311993]

you dont understand Q. once your side gets better tactics are more and more important. But as fletch has said lets let it go

[Fletch74]

Just stating my opinion Fletch  ;)

No your cool 8)

rating 160k alot of managers take everything into account and i have seen some teams scout out their opposition alot more in a league where everyone rates 160k fighting for the 1 promotion spot

Doesn't everybody do that no matter what you rate.

[Master Q]

you dont understand Q. once your side gets better tactics are more and more important. But as fletch has said lets let it go

I feel there's nothing for me to let go... Tactics are always important, yes I may rate lower than you, but that by no means my advice is worse than anyone else's.

[cookie311993]

not exactly flecth tactics become more important the higher your ratings get

[Master Q]

not exactly flecth tactics become more important the higher your ratings get

How so? 50k v 50k game is as close as a 200k v 200k game...

[Fletch74]

not exactly flecth tactics become more important the higher your ratings get

Disagree there.

And does the fact that Q rates lower than you mean that his advice is not worthy because you think tactics is only relevant when you have higher ratings. I have lower ratings than I did last year, but my tactics are IMO more important as a result

[cookie311993]

generally teams rating 200k have very good tactics. Which is why in the PC you see a number of upsets when teams are closer to ratings. You would very rarely if at all see 2 130k teams play in the PC

[Master Q]

Cookie, read your last post again.

130k teams never face off in the PC because of seeding, 205k teams will beat 130k teams 99.999% of the time  ::) 

PC runs on rankings, so it's not a great example... So your last statement is kinda incorrect...

[Fletch74]

You would very rarely if at all see 2 130k teams play in the PC

That's because of the seeding system Cookie, not because tactics aren't important at that level.

My ratings aren't as good as your's, but yet you value my advice? Why?

[Master Q]

You would very rarely if at all see 2 130k teams play in the PC

That's because of the seeding system Cookie, not because tactics aren't important at that level.

I just said that  :P

[Fletch74]

You would very rarely if at all see 2 130k teams play in the PC

That's because of the seeding system Cookie, not because tactics aren't important at that level.

I just said that  :P

We posted at exactly the same time... :P

[Master Q]

You would very rarely if at all see 2 130k teams play in the PC

That's because of the seeding system Cookie, not because tactics aren't important at that level.

I just said that  :P

We posted at exactly the same time... :P

Woah  :o :o :o

[cookie311993]

i value your advice fletch because of what you did in the Knockout comp and the way you answered the stuff about Burton in the bermuda thread. Your tactics in the knockout league were far better than your ratings and you spoke with alot of knowledge and understanding about the game and your nat side. I feel you need to prove you know what you are on about to be valued.

eg. the Canada u/19s when i was assistant. The manager and nips didnt value my opinion although at the WC, election time and after election, i had alot of managers outside FF but also in FF tell me i showed real maturity and knowledge of the game and great understanding . You have to prove you have the knowledge and understanding before people listen to you