FT Kuriketto Ghetto

Maca24 · July 30, 2011, 12:56:39 PM

Shutup Q :P
Lesnar would be better if I wasnt training primaries for NATs :(

cookie311993 · July 30, 2011, 12:56:48 PM

Then end of season saw some big purchases HP

Justin Bieber · July 30, 2011, 12:58:11 PM

Quote from: cookie311993 on July 30, 2011, 12:56:48 PM
Then end of season saw some big purchases HP

Well I had the cash to splurge :P. Still do :-X.

But lets keep the talk on topic fellas! We shall upset all the favourites to sneak through with our cool demeanor!

Master Q · July 30, 2011, 01:00:10 PM

Quote from: Maca24 on July 30, 2011, 12:56:39 PM
Shutup Q :P
Lesnar would be better if I wasnt training primaries for NATs :(

Hemming has

Maca24 · July 30, 2011, 01:03:48 PM

Quote from: Master Q on July 30, 2011, 01:00:10 PM
Quote from: Maca24 on July 30, 2011, 12:56:39 PM
Shutup Q :P
Lesnar would be better if I wasnt training primaries for NATs :(
Hemming has

He is still shower. 8) Spinners dont need power.

Master Q · July 30, 2011, 01:12:09 PM

Hemming is shower? :o He is much better than Lesnar.

cookie311993 · July 30, 2011, 01:13:15 PM

hemming is shower. Out/out how is that better than Except/spec. Please explain?

AFEV · July 30, 2011, 01:14:27 PM

Quote from: Master Q on July 30, 2011, 01:12:09 PM
Hemming is shower? :o He is much better than Lesnar.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL no.
You trolling?

Master Q · July 30, 2011, 04:05:07 PM

Quote from: cookie311993 on July 30, 2011, 01:13:15 PM
hemming is shower. Out/out how is that better than Except/spec. Please explain?

Hemming is Spec/Spec firstly. Lesnar has one pop over Hemming in tech, and is a year younger. That's it. Plus Hemming has OBB, a relevant talent compared to Lesnar's gifted fielding and Natural Leader. Hemming is also FM while Lesnar is a FS...

bomberboy0618 · July 30, 2011, 04:06:44 PM

If he is a fm then he cant be compared to a fs.

Master Q · July 30, 2011, 04:10:09 PM

Quote from: bomberboy0618 on July 30, 2011, 04:06:44 PM
If he is a fm then he cant be compared to a fs.

FM's are more rare than FS's IMO...

bomberboy0618 · July 30, 2011, 04:10:49 PM

Not what I was getting at. Different bowlers need different specific levels of skills.

Master Q · July 30, 2011, 04:13:04 PM

Quote from: bomberboy0618 on July 30, 2011, 04:10:49 PM
Not what I was getting at. Different bowlers need different specific levels of skills.

I know. I think you're getting at that spinners don't need power. So it's pretty much impossible for any seamer to be better than a freak spinner because they don't need power training...

Maca24 · July 30, 2011, 05:29:04 PM

Lesnar beats down on Hemming you fool ::)
Just cas yours is an RFM compared to Lesnar being an LFS, doesnt make him better.
Also that one level of tech is from Spec to Excep! thats a massive difference, takes like a year to get a pop there.

AFEV · July 30, 2011, 05:34:08 PM

Quote from: Master Q on July 30, 2011, 04:13:04 PM
Quote from: bomberboy0618 on July 30, 2011, 04:10:49 PM
Not what I was getting at. Different bowlers need different specific levels of skills.
I know. I think you're getting at that spinners don't need power. So it's pretty much impossible for any seamer to be better than a freak spinner because they don't need power training...

Unfortunately for Lesnar he can't be 'better' than Hemming by your standards because he has to be trained a specific way for NATs.
Different bowlers have different skill sets and you judge them accordingly. OBviously you'd rate a spec/spec rf higher than an exep/excep medium with the same secondaries but not an outs/outs rfm (that is older) over a spec/excep lfs.