Heath Shaw

[Master Q]

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/118632/default.aspx

Lucky I don't have him. Thinking of trading him in.

[Chelskiman]

Well, depends how important this week is to you and whether or not you want to do a double trade. Toy was named on field. My second option would be Martin and wouldn't consider Malceski.

It's not terribly important.  I'm a game clear on top of my league, but it's a handy round that I want to win because 3rd plays 5th and 2nd plays 4th.  If all goes well (5th beats 3rd and 4th beats 2nd) I could nearly wrap up top spot this week.

[elephants]

Shaw -> waters???

Leaves me with 2 trades ::)

[worldbeater21]

Is there anyway for us to get our trade back, if we made it last night?

[Master Q]

Is there anyway for us to get our trade back, if we made it last night?

No.

[SLICE n DICE]

Is there anyway for us to get our trade back, if we made it last night?

HAHAHAHAHAHA

[elephants]

Shaw -> lids.
Even better.

[nas]

i just traded him IN now i have to trade him OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

FMDT

Should have waited at least till teams are announced at least then you would have saved a trade

[mattybomb]

could rawlings be a good replacement

[Andrew]

Screw you Shaw, that's ridiculous. A $10 bet for a $280 return?? You're a professional footballer on hundreds of thousands a year!! Grr... I'm playing Adcock this week instead of benching him, holding Shaw for a week and selling him for Burchill or Fisher. No one looks appealing this week. This changes my plan of selling Gibbs during his bye, but instead I can just play Heppell so not the worst. Plus Gibbs v St. Kilda in round 24 has appeal to me.

[Just Clancy]

For gambling, lol.

[Just Clancy]

Sucks for those who have him (including me).  :P :-[

[-Hector-]

Screw you Shaw, that's ridiculous. A $10 bet for a $280 return?? You're a professional footballer on hundreds of thousands a year!! Grr... I'm playing Adcock this week instead of benching him, holding Shaw for a week and selling him for Burchill or Fisher. No one looks appealing this week. This changes my plan of selling Gibbs during his bye, but instead I can just play Heppell so not the worst. Plus Gibbs v St. Kilda in round 24 has appeal to me.

The article I read said Maxwell was $101-$1 to kick the first goal. Maybe the article was wrong, but that comes out at $1010 return.

Either way, I have learned a valuable lesson today - put your trades on hold until the FINAL teams are announced at least. Gives you the best chance of coming across stuff like this. I can't believe I traded him in though, seriously. My policy was no Shaw or Didak because they're both White Goodmans and both play for Collingwood (perhaps that's the same thing, looking back at what I just said). Spewing - trade wasted and now I'm down to 5! hopefully Fisher will come down enough in price to be a straight swap for Shaw. Got $6,500 surplus so he needs to come down a bit.

[Windigo]

martin looks like the best option. not too keen on getting someone with a bye for the last 8 weeks

My line of thinking excatly.

I'll be looking at a doughy. Have to trade Shaw THIS week.

Backs: Goddard, Fisher, Suckling, Adcock, Gibbs, Scotland & SHAW         Stanley, Hibberd & Coad

Can only afford Stefan Martin & he looks alright.

The article I read said Maxwell was $101-$1 to kick the first goal.

There was a late plunge. He went down to $ 35.

[henry]

I'll bet Shaw won't be the first goal kicker for the rest of the year.