Substitutes

[97crows98]

Bris - Bewick
PA - K.Cornes

[Just Clancy]

thank god it's not Jacobs.

[soutter]

Doesn't effect me but Cornes is an interesting choice by PA

[nostradamus]

bewick is just about a perma sub......has anybody been sub more than him??

[PowerBug]

CORNES!?!?!?

Why would Port choose him?

At least it's not Jacobs.

[nostradamus]

CORNES!?!?!?

Why would Port choose him?

At least it's not Jacobs.

maybe just to get a rocket up him

[plugz19]

bewick is just about a perma sub......has anybody been sub more than him??

not sure, gaff would have a higher strike rate of being sub though :p

surprising because bewick has had a couple of good weeks in his past 2

[Justin Bieber]

Cornes, why would they do that. He's been a quality player in their team for many years now.

[nostradamus]

bewick is just about a perma sub......has anybody been sub more than him??

not sure, gaff would have a higher strike rate of being sub though :p

surprising because bewick has had a couple of good weeks in his past 2

dont understand alot of the choices vossy makes though

[Justin Bieber]

He is a joke of a coach. I can say coming from Brisbane.

[plugz19]

dont understand alot of the choices vossy makes though
[/quote]
yep, you can say that again

[LaHug]

NO! Not Bewick :( I want him to make more cash.

Actually, I don't really need him as anything but M9

[Holz]

geez bewick plays 2 good games when he gets a chance and back to sub. I think the sub rule is really affecting his development without the sub rule he would be getting full games instead of just coming on with a quarter job to do. I dont think thats the right way to develop if it were me i would prefer to play half my matches in the reserves and half in the afl, opposed to constantnly being the sub.