Main Menu

Fanfooty NAT Squad

Started by Maca24, July 01, 2011, 12:53:17 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Barlow 21

Quote from: Maca24 on October 22, 2011, 11:47:49 AM
Quote from: PowerBug on October 22, 2011, 11:17:49 AM
Or maybe a side for each age group. It'll get more of us newer guys involved.
28+
24-27
20-23
Youths.

Will be better for some of us newer players. :)
That would take way to long, and overcomplicates things a bit.

I'd rather make it a First XI with players aged 24 and over, and a Second XI with 23 and under.
Thoughts?
Sounds good :)

CrowsFan

Think I'll start the youth one now since I don't reckon many people will be buying youths in the coming weeks so might as well get it out of the way ;)

Maca24

Quote from: CrowsFan on October 22, 2011, 11:50:40 AM
Think I'll start the youth one now since I don't reckon many people will be buying youths in the coming weeks so might as well get it out of the way ;)
Ok sounds good

Master Q


Justin Bieber


Master Q

I don't care as he's Kenyan  :P

Mordt is a year younger but I'd say he's only a few pops behind.

Currently they have the same Exp and Captaincy but your guy is Out/Out  :-*

cookie311993

Why are we doing under 23 . Thought we were doing it like normal nat squad.  Senior and youth

MajorLazer

I think it's to give everyone an opportunity to get guys in the squad.

I like the idea.

cookie311993

Then we can't use age brackets in the proper side.  Best to be  U24 and best XI

BratPack

Quote from: Master Q on October 22, 2011, 12:12:16 PM
I don't care as he's Kenyan  :P

Mordt is a year younger but I'd say he's only a few pops behind.

Currently they have the same Exp and Captaincy but your guy is Out/Out  :-*

And Lalor is still better than him  :P

Maca24

Quote from: cookie311993 on October 22, 2011, 12:53:55 PM
Then we can't use age brackets in the proper side.  Best to be  U24 and best XI
Cookie just because it doesn't favour you  ::) :P

The way I see it is, an actual NAT squad is always 24 and over, rarely see guys younger.
This means thats our Best XI. Then our 23 and under's are the future NAT's sort of thing, thus being Second XI.

If everyone would prefer it to be 24 and under then voice your opinion.

cookie311993

I have a youngish squad. Not as young as a few others but they are still young. I thought 2nd XI would be best for players that are fringe players for the top squad. I have 2 that qualify for u23 and 3 for u24. Legit candidates that is. I have no problem with the u23/24 concept but then I don't think we can set-up the age brackets for batsman like we did last time

Master Q


cookie311993

youths - u24 - best xi

Some of the younger players could potentially make the top squad if they are high enough. But not very likely IMO

8-6 Suited

Don't make a starting team, make a touring squad instead. 18 players. 7 Batsmen, 2 keepers, 2 AR, 7 bowlers.