Fisher vs Birchall vs Scotland vs Shaw vs Enright

[hally25547]

Hey everyone,
I am in the process of upgrading my defence and this week i plan to go puopolo to any of the above. I am just not sure who to get out of the five. I would probably prefer fisher, birchall or scotland as they are more unique than the rest. I have 5 trades and $136 500. I can straight swap to Shaw, Fisher or Enright but i will need more money to get birchall or scotland. However i can downgrade sandilands this week if i need to. Please give me your opinion on the matter and my backline is below. I also have Ben Jacobs in the mids so i can cover for two hawks or two blues in their bye rounds

Cheers, Hally

Backs: Gibbs, Deledio, Suckling, Heppell, Goddard, Adcock, Stanley - Puopolo, Toy, Howard

[hally25547]

anyone?

thought appreciated  :D

[whorya]

im in the same situation our backs are so similar (esp the starting ones)

i have enright instead of heppell otherwise the other premos are the same
and doing lower - fisher this week

birchall 20k more and bye is the issue v fisher
scotland fnls bye and high cost and i got enright but depending on how many catters you got....

im going fisher but only coz of bye otherwise scotland even with the cost involved!

[Stocutz]

All having great years. Hard to separate. Based largely on byes I'd stick clear of Scotland and birchall and in order go
Fisher enright shaw.

[hally25547]

im in the same situation our backs are so similar (esp the starting ones)

i have enright instead of heppell otherwise the other premos are the same
and doing lower - fisher this week

birchall 20k more and bye is the issue v fisher
scotland fnls bye and high cost and i got enright but depending on how many catters you got....

im going fisher but only coz of bye otherwise scotland even with the cost involved!

yes i do like how fisher has had his bye but i can cover if i choose birchall or scotland and finals bye doesnt concern me

[hally25547]

All having great years. Hard to separate. Based largely on byes I'd stick clear of Scotland and birchall and in order go
Fisher enright shaw.

i think fisher is a good option at this stage

[hardnut]

I'm going Fisher so picked him, super consistent which is rare in the backs. Scotland is the best absolute choice but since we all (wrongly) went Gibbs it's a non-option if league is your bag. Same goes for Enright. We all have too many Hawks as it is and Shaw invented inconsistency from a DT perspective (has actually been close to B&F this year for pies however)

[hally25547]

please vote and comment, i am still unsure of what to do.

[Chopps]

scotland has been super consistent this year and gets you those 120 scores you love to see in the backline hasnt dipped below 90 since rd 3 first two rds 79 & 86 still respectable in the backs

for me its fisher or scotland i personally would spend the extra 33 k and get the bloke average 100 not 91 as long as you have cover for rd 23

[hally25547]

scotland has been super consistent this year and gets you those 120 scores you love to see in the backline hasnt dipped below 90 since rd 3 first two rds 79 & 86 still respectable in the backs

for me its fisher or scotland i personally would spend the extra 33 k and get the bloke average 100 not 91 as long as you have cover for rd 23

fair point chopps