Ask Ziplock

Started by Ziplock, June 21, 2011, 02:12:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

danoz

I'm thinking Knights > Didak and Bartel > Rockliff.

Didak looks to be getting some form, and Knights has done his job, Bartel is not averaging anywhere near where I want him and Rockliff has bottomed out.

Will leave me with 4 trades, and 40k in the bank, but a full team:

Goddard Gibbs Enright Delidio Adcock Lower Scotland (Jacobs Otten Puopolo)
Swan    Pendlebury Rockliff Thompson Boyd Hodge (Heppell Mzungu Hibberd)   
Cox Sandilands (Keefe Vardy)                  
Riewoldt O'Keefe Didak Franklin Goodes Johnson Sylvia (Smith I Darling Lynch)

Ziplock


personally, I don't think I would drop bartel if he's named.

this *form* dids is showing is an average of like 85 over his last three... that being said, you can probably carry that as your 7th fwd.

It's a nice team, my only concern would be dids consistency, as well as carrying two carlton in the backline for finals. As well as that, rd 24 hodgey will probs get rested vsing gc.

Still, worth a shot- knights needs to go... bartel, not so much, unless he isn't named (There have been rumours about him being out for the season).

danoz

Quote from: Ziplock on June 22, 2011, 04:53:06 PM

personally, I don't think I would drop bartel if he's named.

this *form* dids is showing is an average of like 85 over his last three... that being said, you can probably carry that as your 7th fwd.

It's a nice team, my only concern would be dids consistency, as well as carrying two carlton in the backline for finals. As well as that, rd 24 hodgey will probs get rested vsing gc.

Still, worth a shot- knights needs to go... bartel, not so much, unless he isn't named (There have been rumours about him being out for the season).

dids potential is way higher than knighta though. Thanks for your thoughts. appreciate it  :)

Ziplock

oh I agree, knights needs to go for sure.

bomberboy0618

Would you consider Harris-Barlow next week a good trade in sc?

Ziplock

no... not unless barlow pumps up his SC numbers... he's very very highly priced and last game only scored 68 in SC... there would have to be half a dozen better and cheaper options atm.

matt1985

Quote from: Ziplock on June 21, 2011, 09:46:17 PM
Quote from: matt1985 on June 21, 2011, 06:47:40 PM
Hey Zip! I'm looking at upgrading Knights to Sylvia this week, which is all good!

But i'm also looking at trading Heppell out before he bleeds too much cash! After I upgrade to Sylvia, I will have exactly 320k left for the Heppell trade...

I have had a look at my options for around that price mark, and am looking at maybe Mackie, Johncock or Gram...

My current back line is:

Gibbs, Delidio, Suckling, Shaw, Enright Heppell, Hibberd (Goddard, Puopolo, Howard)

I was thinking maybe just doing the Sylvia trade, then possibly doing a downgrade/upgrade the week after and get a true premium for Heppell the week after? I only have 6 trades remaining and my team is pretty much complete!

Thanks for your help Zip!

if you have that much cash left, the little heppell leaks this week (if he's named) won't affect you too much, esp. if you're team is nearly complete. Upgrade to someone like fisher next round? (after stk bye)

showere sorry Zip  I worded my post wrong! I will have 320k after my trade to Sylvia. This is including Heppell's price, I have roughly 77k now and will have 30 odd left over after upgrading to Sylvia.

So if Heppell leaks more this week it means less money for me if I hold him. I would love to get Fisher or another higher priced player, but I would probs have to do a double downgrade next week to get him.

I have seen that the Saints have a good run for the next 5 rounds or so, so was thinking maybe Gram could find some form over these weeks and be a bargain pick up?

Thanks for your thoughts mate!

Ziplock

mmmm, I wouldn't bet on gram finding form. He's barely been able to even break into the team of late. Unless cash is going to be incredibly tight, I would just double downgrade next week. With a complete team, 10, even 20k won't make a difference.

Fisher looks like your best bet.

matt1985

Cheers thanks mate, i'll wait the extra week! Hopefully Heppell scores a ton this week to soften the blow :P

pinochio

is getting rid of montagna really that beneficial???
...i can and very well might but is it that wise, I have stuck to this point with him???


....you think he isnt is his DT slut form any more???

i have 10 trades and 90k....to get mitchell i would have to get didak over sylvia for knights...
>>>mitchy would be my 6th mid, didak my 7th forward

or just stick to sylvia???

Ziplock

Quote from: pinochio on June 23, 2011, 01:56:25 AM
is getting rid of montagna really that beneficial???
...i can and very well might but is it that wise, I have stuck to this point with him???


....you think he isnt is his DT slut form any more???

i have 10 trades and 90k....to get mitchell i would have to get didak over sylvia for knights...
>>>mitchy would be my 6th mid, didak my 7th forward

or just stick to sylvia???

Keep montags and trade in sylvia- montagna has a ridiculously easy run coming up, and he's dropped so much cash it isnt worth trading him out--> he's averaging 92 including an injury affected 50 and sub affected 45.

Bak2Form


danoz

#72
So Im reconsidering now. Debating Didak. I can down Darling to Callinan and pick up Chapman for Knights, but that will leave me with 5 cats for rd 23... If i pick up fyfe, i have 4 players missing in rd 16, and if i pick up didak, im getting a lower score, and making more money... or i can pick up a B Harvey... So many choices

Ziplock

with the finals bye I wouldn't even consider 5 cats. Overall, 4 players in rd 16 can be covered if they're on separate lines- and for league, rd 16 is a multi bye isn't it? No problem there. Fyfe is no *real* issue if you have good depth on your bench.

bomberboy0618

Are matera-sylvia and duigan-newman good trades?