top non-finals-bye backmen

mike_3456 · June 20, 2011, 02:21:38 PM

I need to trade out adcock and was wondering who was the best replacement? I've got enough cash to afford anyone but don't want any of the players who have a bye in the finals (I think that is roos, cats, blues, bombers?). My backline is currently gibbs, shaw, goddard, adcock, deledio, heppell, puopolo, (duigan, mckernan, toy). My first thought was suckling, or wait till next week and get fisher?

thanme · June 20, 2011, 02:22:28 PM

I'd totally go Fisher after the bye.

Chelskiman · June 20, 2011, 02:23:06 PM

Suckling or Fisher look good. Flip a coin would be the easiest way to decide who to bring in.

Andrew · June 20, 2011, 02:36:18 PM

Without knowing your full team, you could have too many Hawks getting Suckling. Grab Fisher next week but Adcock will be back in 2-3 weeks...

mike_3456 · June 20, 2011, 02:43:44 PM

you could be right because I also have Buddy, Mitchell and Bailey. Seems like fisher is the go, assuming that adcock wont immediately be back to his best 2-3.

swishy · June 20, 2011, 02:59:32 PM

fisher, just because he was always a target for me to get

bigsy · June 20, 2011, 03:31:40 PM

same dilemma i'm facing-was thinking about enright, but would prefer someone with no finals bye-- broughton??

Andrew · June 20, 2011, 03:45:19 PM

Duffield if you've got too many Hawks in your team to get Suckling.