Make My Team As Strong As Possible. As Quick As Possible?

Started by Windigo, June 12, 2011, 11:27:01 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

HMM

Hibberd>Scotland & Lower>Broughton
2 (14.3%)
Hibberd>Scotland (Wait A Week, Go Lower>Shaw)
6 (42.9%)
Coad>Scotland & Lower>Broughton (Might Be Tight Though)
6 (42.9%)

Total Members Voted: 2

Windigo

Simply:

Coad>Scotland & Lower>Broughton

Depends on how Broughton goes and If I can afford him. Otherwise Jacobs>Scotland.

Keep Stanley as great bench cover.

I was gunna get Shaw, but my backs will lose me league matches.


BACKS: Gibbs, Scotland, Broughton, Adcock, Goddard, Suckling & Heppell        Puopolo, Jacobs & Stanley

Wes Mantooth

Why will your backs lose you league matches if you get shaw?

Windigo

QuoteWhy will your backs lose you league matches if you get shaw?

Hm maybe I worded that wrong.

I'd pick up Scotland and wait a week for Shaw after his bye.........Or I could get 2 good scorers right after lockout.

Is it worth waiting on Shaw? I don't really like him as a player and I've never had him in my team.

Wes Mantooth

As someone who has been burnt by in the past and decided to take the risk again, my faith has been restored.

Windigo

Quoteas someone who has been burnt by in the past and decided to take the risk again, my faith has been restored.

Haha, don't speak too soon Wes....... :P

Do yah reckon Broughton can score around the same as Shaw? I'll assess after both have played.

But if I get Broughton, I finally get rid of the scourge of my backline. COAD!  >:(

plugz19

feels weird saying this, but shaw seems the safer option

would you to jacobs->scotland, or could you do hibberd->scotland and have jacobs in your mids?
just seems jacobs' js is a fair bit better than hibberd

Windigo

Quotewould you to jacobs->scotland, or could you do hibberd->scotland and have jacobs in your mids?
just seems jacobs' js is a fair bit better than hibberd

Yeah that could work.  :)

I'd have out Lower>ANY BACK

BoozBlues

theres no need to get rid of coad, im sure you have mpp and looks like to have 2 other good bench players to cover premiums. he's just like richo, think youve gotta keep them or else there too much $ on the bench, seems like a waste

Windigo

Hopefully Coad gets back on the park for the last 3 games.

I'll look at Heath. But if he gets a sub 60 vs the dees...... :-\

Andrew

I wouldn't even be considering selling Lower at the moment. Averaging 90+ over the past 3 weeks with another home game coming up!

Windigo

QuoteI wouldn't even be considering selling Lower at the moment. Averaging 90+ over the past 3 weeks with another home game coming up!

yeah true. But Stanley is carving as well. But if he misses weeks for the bump he did, I'll move him along.


Andrew

Mmm Stanley is certainly going well and I'm disappointed I decided to cash in on him instead of selling Toy for Ben Jacobs. Hold onto both of them for now, you can easily be starting both currently. Upgrading them won't get you many more points but I didn't see Stanley's report. Maybe worth selling if he's out, particularly if Hibberd comes back for you. But if not I'd be holding...

Windigo

I have 12 trades and have the opportunity to finish my team this week.

I'm worried that if all goes well I'll have too many trades and no-where to use them.  :P

Andrew

Quote from: Windigo on June 12, 2011, 01:36:46 PM
I have 12 trades and have the opportunity to finish my team this week.

I'm worried that if all goes well I'll have too many trades and no-where to use them.  :P

No, that just means you'll be able to trade out guys who cop a DT final bye, if you so choose. Which would include Scotland if you happened to get him.

Windigo

Getting Scotland & Shaw.

I'll assess how Shaw goes......