This weeks trade...

Started by jvalles, May 25, 2011, 09:24:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

valkorum

Darling I think can be that permanent player you have on your bench to cover byes for the rest of the year.  He consistantly gets his 65 - 75 points which is better than a donut when one of your premiums has a bye


jvalles

Quote from: valkorum on May 26, 2011, 05:16:51 PM
Darling I think can be that permanent player you have on your bench to cover byes for the rest of the year.  He consistantly gets his 65 - 75 points which is better than a donut when one of your premiums has a bye

Just feel like Smith is wasting away on the bench in my rucks.

valkorum

Smith wont be wasted for the next 4 weeks for most teams with Sandi down and out.  Smith comes off the bench to start for my team while the big fella looks for a moon boot big enough to fit his foot

jvalles

Quote from: valkorum on May 26, 2011, 05:27:34 PM
Smith wont be wasted for the next 4 weeks for most teams with Sandi down and out.  Smith comes off the bench to start for my team while the big fella looks for a moon boot big enough to fit his foot

But I have Petrie and Cox as my starters, need to get in Lobbe to use it properly.

jvalles

Looks like Enright out has made me change my plans.

Option 1: Double Downgrade of Darling --> Lynch & Tapscott --> Mzungu

Option 2: Tapscott --> Mzungu and Stanley to any 344K backman

Leading options: Suckling, Pratt, Birchall, Martin (smashing it with no Jamar), Newman, Hargrave, Harbrow (was my plan to get him in after GC's last bye all along, but don't know) or Duffield (will get run in the mids for at least another 4 weeks).

Opinions?


LaHug

Suckling or Newman.
Suckling may or may not be named, so wait for that one.
Newman is getting better with the Tigers' improvement and (I hope) that should continue. Against Port this week, expect a good one!

jvalles

Quote from: LaHug on May 26, 2011, 07:57:11 PM
Suckling or Newman.
Suckling may or may not be named, so wait for that one.
Newman is getting better with the Tigers' improvement and (I hope) that should continue. Against Port this week, expect a good one!

Only thing about Newman is Tigers still have 2 byes to go.

Leaning towards Birchall at this stage as he seems to have less erratic scores than Suckling.

LaHug

Quote from: jvalles on May 26, 2011, 08:00:19 PM
Quote from: LaHug on May 26, 2011, 07:57:11 PM
Suckling or Newman.
Suckling may or may not be named, so wait for that one.
Newman is getting better with the Tigers' improvement and (I hope) that should continue. Against Port this week, expect a good one!

Only thing about Newman is Tigers still have 2 byes to go.

Leaning towards Birchall at this stage as he seems to have less erratic scores than Suckling.
Good point with Newman. You can always watch him before his first bye and pick him up if he's doing well after the bye. Don't know much about Birchall, so can't comment.