Didak to Chapman

[The Grundles]

mate....Shiggins is the one to get rid of! Injury prone and now being used as a sub...pffft easy choice IMO

[Holz]

mate....Shiggins is the one to get rid of! Injury prone and now being used as a sub...pffft easy choice IMO

he is not being used as a sub, he got subbed of due to needing stiches. Not sure why i would trade out one of the best forwards.

[The Grundles]

mate....Shiggins is the one to get rid of! Injury prone and now being used as a sub...pffft easy choice IMO

he is not being used as a sub, he got subbed of due to needing stiches. Not sure why i would trade out one of the best forwards.

You are joking right???

161 B/E, has been out with injury for previous 3 rounds then subbed due to stitches?? The guy is made of glass!

I wouldn't touch him IMO and would look to offload him real soon

[Holz]

mate....Shiggins is the one to get rid of! Injury prone and now being used as a sub...pffft easy choice IMO

he is not being used as a sub, he got subbed of due to needing stiches. Not sure why i would trade out one of the best forwards.

You are joking right???

161 B/E, has been out with injury for previous 3 rounds then subbed due to stitches?? The guy is made of glass!

I wouldn't touch him IMO and would look to offload him real soon

i think your the one who is joking, averaged over 100 untill he was subbed of for an injury that is very unlikely to make him miss this week.  So i trade  out forward capable of an 100 average who is most likely playing this week, instead of a rookie whos average will push 80 at best

[Chopps]

if higgins is playing you wouldnt trade him.

[The Grundles]

if higgins is playing you wouldnt trade him.

But thats the thing...he isn't playing! We have all been stung by higgins before and I just can't justify getting or keeping him. Would Swan, Boyd, Chapman, Voldt, Franklin etc etc etc etc etc get subbed out for STITCHES!!!  Not a top 5 forward simply due to his inability to stay away from injury.