Help me help you

[Footy God]

Which downgrade:
Matera-Mzungu OR Otten-Hibberd


Current team:
Goddard, Gibbs, Heppell, Lids, Lower, Stanley, Duigan (Otten, Toy, Pup)
Swan, Pendles, Boyd, Bartel, Montagna, Krak (DPP) (Harris, Bewick, Jacobs (DPP)
Sandi, Cox
Stevie J, Chappy, Higgins, Buddy, Riewdolt, Knights, Darling (Matera, Richo, Tapscott)

The upgrade will be Darling-Goodes

[Wraygun]

Otten - Hibberd, Last week you can get on Hibbs :)

[TMurphBROWNLOW]

your forward line will be amazing and your backline terrible, do the mzungu trade if you have to, but your priority should be improving your back 7.

[Possumo]

your forward line will be amazing and your backline terrible, do the mzungu trade if you have to, but your priority should be improving your back 7.

Exactly, Darling should score better than Pup, Lower or Duigan, who you're all relying on playing with no emg in your backline... it definitely needs another premium, although perhaps its worth waiting to see how Hargrave/Malcheski go, as the Shaw/Adcock boat is a wee bit expensive now...

[Footy God]

your forward line will be amazing and your backline terrible, do the mzungu trade if you have to, but your priority should be improving your back 7.

Exactly, Darling should score better than Pup, Lower or Duigan, who you're all relying on playing with no emg in your backline... it definitely needs another premium, although perhaps its worth waiting to see how Hargrave/Malcheski go, as the Shaw/Adcock boat is a wee bit expensive now...

I understand this, I can't afford the Adcock/Shaw option.

Goodes is cheap and I see him averaging 100 for the rets of the year after looking at his draw. He wont be 360k ever again imo. BE of 40.

[TMurphBROWNLOW]

your forward line will be amazing and your backline terrible, do the mzungu trade if you have to, but your priority should be improving your back 7.

Exactly, Darling should score better than Pup, Lower or Duigan, who you're all relying on playing with no emg in your backline... it definitely needs another premium, although perhaps its worth waiting to see how Hargrave/Malcheski go, as the Shaw/Adcock boat is a wee bit expensive now...

I understand this, I can't afford the Adcock/Shaw option.

Goodes is cheap and I see him averaging 100 for the rets of the year after looking at his draw. He wont be 360k ever again imo. BE of 40.

I can understand where you're coming from, I guess what you've done is actually very smart because the defenders are the ones who aren't performing as strongly. therefore in later rounds you can see whose making an impact/ playing well/ scoring consistently and choose your defenders then :)

[Possumo]

Yeah, agreed the logic is good (pun intended :D).

This week has kind've turned things on its head though... I reckon perhaps the DT staff got the AFL to intervene and convince all the defenders they've got to start racking it up more :)