Can't get them both...

[LaHug]

Hmm... Does anyone have an estimate as to how much Goodes/Suckling will rise this week?
If I'd made downgrades last week, I could get both this week. Darn it!

Goodes ~24.7

Suckling ~20.9 (if he only scores 75)

So... essentially the same and I could get them both in during the next two weeks with 4 trades. Considering the fact that Suckling is playing Sydney and I'm still not certain, I think I'll get Goodes this week and decide on Suckling next week.

Just wondering, who do people think I should trade out for him? Surely Curnow, but who out of Tapscott/Matera

[LaHug]

To make things easier, my mid and forward rookies are...
Mid: Libba, Curnow, Harris, Bewick
For: Darling, Krakouer, Tapscott, Matera, Richardson

[Nails]

To make things easier, my mid and forward rookies are...
Mid: Libba, Curnow, Harris, Bewick
For: Darling, Krakouer, Tapscott, Matera, Richardson

If out of Matera/Tapscott one is going to be a keeper I'd get rid of Tapscott

After this week Matera has zero more byes and should play 22 (has he missed any yet?)

Tapscott = if he plays another shocker could get dropped and has another bye coming up still.

Sure Tapscott will probably average more, but Matera is better for keeping for now IMO.

[Andrew]

Probably Tapscott, Matera's b/e is pretty much half (52 v 24) and he seems more consistent. I really thought Tapscott would get more touches than what he does being such a good kick.

[LaHug]

Thanks guys! Unless I change my mind (which is quite likely), it'll be Curnow --> Smith and Matera --> Goodes. :D
Then, need to get Swan after his bye (if I can wait that long) or next week if his B/E is too low. Don't care if that takes two trades, will be worth it.

[Nails]

Thanks guys! Unless I change my mind (which is quite likely), it'll be Curnow --> Smith and Matera --> Goodes. :D
Then, need to get Swan after his bye (if I can wait that long) or next week if his B/E is too low. Don't care if that takes two trades, will be worth it.

We both said keep Matera and you're getting rid of him?  ???

Swan's BE this week: 140

His projected score: 111.

I'd prefer get an extra 20 points or whatever (probably won't be extra if you're getting Goodes instead)

But if Swan scores 111 this round (he'll score more ;) ) he'll only lose $9.7k

[Andrew]

Goodes has a far lower b/e and is a good buy this week, but if you don't have Swan you must find a way of getting him in next week or the week after.

[LaHug]

MAMMOTH TYPO!!!
I meant Tapscott-->Goodes
Can't get Swan this week if I want Goodes. Will get Swan next week!