Time To Ship Some Much Needed Goodes Into FWD Port!

Started by Windigo, May 15, 2011, 11:37:58 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Windigo

Is it worth Downgrading Darling>Lynch & then Tapscott>Goodes?

Lynch would only be a bench player?

It would make FWD line like this.

Franklin, N.Riewoldt, Sylvia, S.Johnson, Higgins, Goodes & Petrie               Matera, Harper & Lynch       

Then the week after Bruce>Enright

After all that 15 trades and my FWD, Rucks & Mids are set just my backline would need work.

Goddard, Gibbs, Adcock, Enright, Heppell, Stanley & Jacobs/Puopolo     

P.S: Petrie is still a solid 7th player with his junk time 60 yesty, will keep assessing but keeping him at the moment...

ShaynoB

Can u downgrade someone else but Darling?

Im just thinking along the same lines of u but when one of ur FWDS has a bye then u dont really have great scoring cover. Your 3 benchies wont score anything over 60-70 i wouldnt have thought, whereas Darling seems to be going along nicely and could still provide good scoring cover.

Just a thought and i guess and yeah like Bruce to Enright trade though

Windigo

Yeah, I'm not to serious on the Goodes thing as yet.

My orginal plan was just Bruce>Enright and sit for a couple of week.

It's just Goodes won't fall in price anymore.

wcarey

i'd do it Windigo. I'm getting goodes & sylvia in next week for tapscott & darling. Luckily I've got the cash in the bank so im not downgrading through. Will then trade matera to Lynch the following week to free up some cash

someguy

Quote from: Windigo on May 15, 2011, 11:37:58 AM
Is it worth Downgrading Darling>Lynch & then Tapscott>Goodes?

Lynch would only be a bench player?

It would make FWD line like this.

Franklin, N.Riewoldt, Sylvia, S.Johnson, Higgins, Goodes & Petrie               Matera, Harper & Lynch       

Then the week after Bruce>Enright

After all that 15 trades and my FWD, Rucks & Mids are set just my backline would need work.

Goddard, Gibbs, Adcock, Enright, Heppell, Stanley & Jacobs/Puopolo     

P.S: Petrie is still a solid 7th player with his junk time 60 yesty, will keep assessing but keeping him at the moment...

Only problem is Higgins - what if he doesn't play this week? If he doesn't, you're forced to cover him with either Matera, Harper or Lynch who are a far cry from Darling OR go Higgins --> Goodes?

Nails

Quote from: someguy on May 15, 2011, 12:28:19 PM
Quote from: Windigo on May 15, 2011, 11:37:58 AM
Is it worth Downgrading Darling>Lynch & then Tapscott>Goodes?

Lynch would only be a bench player?

It would make FWD line like this.

Franklin, N.Riewoldt, Sylvia, S.Johnson, Higgins, Goodes & Petrie               Matera, Harper & Lynch       

Then the week after Bruce>Enright

After all that 15 trades and my FWD, Rucks & Mids are set just my backline would need work.

Goddard, Gibbs, Adcock, Enright, Heppell, Stanley & Jacobs/Puopolo     

P.S: Petrie is still a solid 7th player with his junk time 60 yesty, will keep assessing but keeping him at the moment...

Only problem is Higgins - what if he doesn't play this week? If he doesn't, you're forced to cover him with either Matera, Harper or Lynch who are a far cry from Darling OR go Higgins --> Goodes?

I bolded those with byes next week too :)

someguy

#6
Quote from: Nails on May 15, 2011, 12:29:27 PM
QuoteOnly problem is Higgins - what if he doesn't play this week? If he doesn't, you're forced to cover him with either Matera, Harper or Lynch who are a far cry from Darling OR go Higgins --> Goodes?

I bolded those with byes next week too :)

haha good pick-up Nails!

Windigo

Matera> Smith better option then.

That's if I even do it.