Next round

Started by Footy God, May 14, 2011, 11:18:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Footy God

This round has gone shower for me so Im going to look at next weeks trades to fix thing up. Once again want to double trade.

Line up for next week:
Goddard, Heppell, Lids, Gibbs, Duigan, Lower, Puopollo (Otten, Stanley, Toy)
Swan, Montagna, Chappy, Pendles, Bartel, Boyd (Jacobs, Harris, Bewick)
Cox, Sandi (Smith, Derickx)
Stevie J, Higgins (HOPEFULLY), Franklin, N.Riewoldt, Knights, Darling, Tapscott (Matera, Krak, Richo)

One of Tapscott/Duigan to be upgraded to either Goodes/Enright.

A)
Stanley (232)-Hibberd (92)

Bank: 150

Tapscott (210)-Goodes (360)

Line up for next week:
Goddard, Heppell, Lids, Gibbs, Duigan, Lower, Puopollo (Otten, Hibberd, Toy)
Swan, Montagna, Chappy, Pendles, Bartel, Boyd (Jacobs, Harris, Bewick)
Cox, Sandi (Smith, Derickx)
Stevie J, Higgins, Goodes, Franklin, N.Riewoldt, Knights, Darling (Matera, Krak, Richo)

B)
Duigan (218)-Hibberd (92)
Bank: 136
Stanley (232)-Adcock


Line up for next week:
Goddard, Heppell, Lids, Gibbs, Adcock, Lower, Puopollo (Otten, Hibberd, Toy)
Swan, Montagna, Chappy, Pendles, Bartel, Boyd (Jacobs, Harris, Bewick)
Cox, Sandi (Smith, Derickx)
Stevie J, Higgins, Franklin, N.Riewoldt, Knights, Tapscott, Darling (Matera, Krak, Richo)


A or B????


LaHug

Firstly, you've made a mistake with your option B line up (it lists Goodes).

But I would definitely go with option A because it seems to be now or never with Goodes.

Goddard_18


Footy God

According to fanfooty ill be 2k off Goodes. Worried, hope the prices go my way.

Spite

Quote from: Footy God on May 14, 2011, 11:28:55 PM
According to fanfooty ill be 2k off Goodes. Worried, hope the prices go my way.

Two weeks ago (before goodes scored the 129) I was $100 off getting him in. Ended up bringing in deledio instead and got goodes the week after. Hope the prices go your way too, I need darling to rise by about 12k to get in judd or bartel next week. If I miss by $100 again, i'll be... angry.

Problems

I like A too, but instead of Stanley maybe use Heppell (unless you plan him to be a keeper) due to his high BE - this may leave your bench thin next week too so be wary of my dodgy advice  ;)

Footy God

Quote from: Problems on May 14, 2011, 11:33:24 PM
I like A too, but instead of Stanley maybe use Heppell (unless you plan him to be a keeper) due to his high BE - this may leave your bench thin next week too so be wary of my dodgy advice  ;)
Good idea but yeaa, I see Heppell as a definite keeper.

Nails

You might struggle to get Goodes if you can't get him this week as previously mentioned.

Of all the teams he has left to play the Hawks are his favourite by a country mile! Averages 102.64 against them over his career, WB is 2nd with a 92 avg for his career then everyone else he's 88 avg or lower over...

Therefore if you want Goodes, do whatever you can do to get him this week because he's going to go up, up and away!

Footy God

#8

I have 9,300.

Heres the math:
Stanley (232,100)-Hibberd (92,500) + 9,300
=148,900

Tapscott (209,500)

Means I can afford a player worth 358,400. Predicted that Goodes will be 362,100.

FMDT!

Spite

Darling to Goodes instead? Probably worth it in the long run as I don't expect Darling to be a 7th forward (maybe 8th) and let tapscott be your 8th forward?

Footy God

Quote from: Spite on May 14, 2011, 11:57:46 PM
Darling to Goodes instead? Probably worth it in the long run as I don't expect Darling to be a 7th forward (maybe 8th) and let tapscott be your 8th forward?
If Darling scores under 70 tomorrow good option as I dont plan on keeping him.


Spite

Then depending on who's named, you can go duigan/otten to goodes instead as stanley's 88 will mean he's on the rise for a bit longer?

If darling scores, let's say 60, how much do you think he will rise? 10-15k? (Thats enough for otten > hibberd/jacbos, darling > goodes)

theswiz

you can always do krak instead of tappas

Problems

I think you gotta keep Kraka for now with a BE of -26, and probably keep him on the bench unless you like rollercoaster rides

theswiz

@problems... yeah he does have a low BE but I'd rather get rid of krak and get in goodes than have to trade darling who IMO is better than krak and far more consistent