Pratt Owners...

RiOtChEsS · May 14, 2011, 03:26:20 PM

Reported in the first qtr for striking :o

Fireballz · May 14, 2011, 03:28:45 PM

Not reported. Will be looked at by the match review panel but its was really low impact. Would be unlucky to get a week for it I reckon.

RiOtChEsS · May 14, 2011, 03:31:06 PM

really? my bad :-[

Fireballz · May 14, 2011, 03:33:00 PM

I was actually surprised he wasn't because it looked pretty rough when I saw it live but the replayed showed it was a slight graze and Newton sold it. I'm biased though because I am one of many who traded him in for Grimes :-\

RiOtChEsS · May 14, 2011, 03:35:34 PM

i actually went Rawlings solely based on durability...

Pratt has had injury concerns over his career and i had some shocking trades last year with an LTI to another LTI and then again :-[

didnt want that again this year :-X

Fireballz · May 14, 2011, 03:48:39 PM

I am immediately regretting my decision... :(

Bluke · May 14, 2011, 03:48:55 PM

Has to be a week. Sorry Pratt owners.

C-Dogg · May 14, 2011, 05:26:04 PM

cant believe any1 who would trade pratt in with no job security

Windigo · May 14, 2011, 05:30:26 PM

Wow, people actually got Pratt?

I know he has been busting out the good scores.....But.....

elephants · May 14, 2011, 06:59:49 PM

Got Rawlings instead. :) still not such a flash score.

fran · May 14, 2011, 07:14:52 PM

Potential news for richardson owners. should go for a week i think, and with pederson being giving a chance last week and failing to impress this could give another opportunity to richardson.

Bluke · May 14, 2011, 07:23:16 PM

Quote from: fran on May 14, 2011, 07:14:52 PM
Potential news for richardson owners. should go for a week i think, and with pederson being giving a chance last week and failing to impress this could give another opportunity to richardson.

I like I like