Have you got the guts?

[Sammocorw]

I'm seriously thinking of bringing in Kerr for Curnow this week as he only looks better with every game. What do you think?

[Possumo]

I think I might do a La Hug and be gentle before everyone start's posting how you should be hung, drawn and quartered for even suggesting the trade :P

In all seriousness though, he does look like he is improving, but he has only had two decent games in a row, and if you look at his scoring history, he has averaged between 60 and 75 for most of his career, barring an average of 81 in 2006 and 93 in 2007... unless he continues to carve it up (and by the time you would have any confidence in bringing him in his price would have already risen to much), he just too much of a risk to bring in. There are a lot of better midfield/rookie options around, not to mention that the rule for most posters on here is to only bring in premiums... which should go doubly for the midfield.

Unless this is just trolling? ;)

[Windigo]

Wish I had Kerr at the start.

Not for me. He really cannot handle a tag. If he has some more dominant mids to deflect attention from him, he would be such a gun.

But he really is a great player and it is such a shame that he is playing out his career at WCE. Imagine if he played for Collingwood or something?  ???

[Nails]

Definitely not trolling.

If he tons up next week, he'll go a long way to earning himself a spot in my side.

Who knows, Kerr is a star, he might end up earning a 90+ avg, he has missed a lot of footy and is at a relatively decent age still for dream teaming.

Kerr is a star and will therefore be used a lot by the Weagle's midfield.

At worst he'd be a great 7th mid.

[Flame]

No...not on my radar!!

[Possumo]

Definitely not trolling.

If he tons up next week, he'll go a long way to earning himself a spot in my side.

Who knows, Kerr is a star, he might end up earning a 90+ avg, he has missed a lot of footy and is at a relatively decent age still for dream teaming.

Kerr is a star and will therefore be used a lot by the Weagle's midfield.

At worst he'd be a great 7th mid.

But why have him as a 7th mid when keeping a rookie you've had from the start or using a downgrade rookie as cover will probably do the same job (and possibly better). Until you've got a full list of premiums in every position I wouldn't reckon it's the best option...

[Nails]

He's a gun who could potentially average 95+

Great cover if you have say Gibbs out in the finals.

I'd only consider getting him as a 7th if he's going to average higher numbers than my bench rooks really

idk probably not the best idea, but has good potential and who knows could become a keeper, highly unlikely obviously.

[fidou]

I love watching this guy play footy as he is a great in and under player but he is definatley not a DT player of any note. Just look at him play but do not trade him in.

[thanme]

Kerr hasn't had a decent DT season since Judd and Cousins left. As soon as he hits top form, he'll get tagged and probably average in the 70s. I think he would have been useful for his price increases, but not as a keeper.

[love4thegame]

The votes say everything haha

[yorgis]

thought about him b4 the season started because of his price, but decided against it.

he is getting back to form, but i don't know if he can control his temper when he starts getting tagged

[DG]

ive got the guts not to  ;)

[RiOtChEsS]

too many chances of things going pearshaped with DK...

fragile body fragile temper :-X

[Bluke]

Yep, only an option in SC imo.

[thatguy]

thought about him b4 the season started because of his price, but decided against it.

he is getting back to form, but i don't know if he can control his temper when he starts getting tagged

i did that each year for the past 2.

love the way he goes about it (bar the wanting to punch someone every two weeks) but on my DT black list. alongside H Shaw and probably J Grimes now!