Joey

[Spite]

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/no-action-from-carlton-blues-over-st-kilda-saints-scuffle-with-ed-curnow/story-e6frf9jf-1226053074940

Suspended for two weeks. That hurts. With grimes and curnow also in my team, (along with higgins) it is going to be a painful 2 weeks!!!

[pinochio]

cant he reduce it???


...will he?

[RiOtChEsS]

yep 1 with an early plea

[pinochio]

when will we know if he takes an early plea???

[pinochio]

so its 1 now def??

[Holz]

when will we know if he takes an early plea???

i would say 99% chance of pleading guilty. The fact curnow was injured will make him plead guilty.

[pinochio]

holz, will we find out by like tomoz morning???

VENT - traded him in for krak the week he got 113 and monty only 70....injury rumour yesturday and now this freakin suspension.....was 2.3cm away from watson when making the trade!!!!!!!!

[Prospector_1]

Depends on appeal ... as I understand it, it could all be dropped ... IF ...

[Prospector_1]

What's the rush? We'll know before lock-out.

[Holz]

holz, will we find out by like tomoz morning???

VENT - traded him in for krak the week he got 113 and monty only 70....injury rumour yesturday and now this freakin suspension.....was 2.3cm away from watson when making the trade!!!!!!!!

same for me, i would have gone selwood if it wasnt for the bye

[Prospector_1]

ah, ye of little faith!

[BGK]

2 weeks if he fights it, 1 if he pleads guilty. Hopefully he just takes the 1 week.

ahh shower, if he hit an injured player i dont care if he he is in my dt give him 4 - 5 weeks i didnt see it but thats poor form

It wasn't ridiculously hard, but it was awful nonetheless!

Holz, I can only presume you didn't watch the game. The bump was when Curnow was hurt and making his way off the field in the first instance. It was a stupid bump as at the time no one knew how bad it was. Yes he came back on but at that point it didn't look good for Curnow at the time. He deserved to get 2 games in my opinion.

i dont see what injury has to do with it, its not the same as a player who is injured and is trying to geto ff the ground. He came back on, if he was injured he shouldnt have been on. In my opinion they should just look if the bump, if its a bump that gives you 2 weeks on any player im happy for him to sit out, but for him to miss 5 weeks becasue the player was injured isnt fair.

[TMurphBROWNLOW]

this will make dal santo an easier choice then next week :/

[BGK]

Whoops dam I phone. Lol

Here it is again.

Holz, I can only presume you didn't watch the game. The bump was when Curnow was hurt and making his way off the field in the first instance. It was a stupid bump as at the time no one knew how bad it was. Yes he came back on but at that point it didn't look good for Curnow at the time. He deserved to get 2 games in my opinion.

[ronl]

There's something seriously wrong with the culture at St Kilda.  Goes to show where self-satified complacency will get you (not to mention teenage girls and a few photographs).