Dammit Swan

[MarkPlow]

hacking it up atm

[TMurphBROWNLOW]

hacking it up atm

better than libba  :'(

[MarkPlow]

little more expectation than libba

[MarkPlow]

Swan or pendles havent touched it since early in the quarter really frustrating me

[TMurphBROWNLOW]

swan will ton it up. higgins-like last quarter coming up for him.

[Andrew]

little more expectation than libba

LOL just a little :P Swan is punishing those who were greedy by not taking the Cox 121. Will probably still score a 100 but expecting heaps more than 121 from any player is over-optimism.

[Holz]

little more expectation than libba

LOL just a little :P Swan is punishing those who were greedy by not taking the Cox 121. Will probably still score a 100 but expecting heaps more than 121 from any player is over-optimism.

i would say its punishing those who are either greedy or did there research. From all past stats this should have been swans highest score of the season. Last year he killed the dogs and his lowest score from his past 3 has been easily above the 121.

[MarkPlow]

hmmm. I am one of those that didn't take cox 121. Swan's average is 130...

[Sleeken]

little more expectation than libba

LOL just a little :P Swan is punishing those who were greedy by not taking the Cox 121. Will probably still score a 100 but expecting heaps more than 121 from any player is over-optimism.

True. I should've stuck with cox.

[deekay]

I rolled a dice with grimes, obvious reasons I kept the C on Swan.... :(

[Andrew]

hmmm. I am one of those that didn't take cox 121. Swan's average is 130...

So for the sake of 18 points (9 doubled) you took the risk? It has gotta be greedy. Don't get me wrong I was expecting Swan to score 110-130 today. But I already had someone to skipper who had 121 locked in...

[Holz]

hmmm. I am one of those that didn't take cox 121. Swan's average is 130...

So for the sake of 18 points (9 doubled) you took the risk? It has gotta be greedy. Don't get me wrong I was expecting Swan to score 110-130 today. But I already had someone to skipper who had 121 locked in...

i expected 135+ so it was worth the risk, didnt payy off today but the chance if him scoring 30 under cox is alot lower than the chance of him scoring 150+.

[MarkPlow]

hmmm. I am one of those that didn't take cox 121. Swan's average is 130...

So for the sake of 18 points (9 doubled) you took the risk? It has gotta be greedy. Don't get me wrong I was expecting Swan to score 110-130 today. But I already had someone to skipper who had 121 locked in...

I have a high ranking so if i wanna climb up even further I gotta take risks

[TMurphBROWNLOW]

I rolled a dice with grimes, obvious reasons I kept the C on Swan.... :(

same boat here, heard grimes averaged 121 past 3 games so thought it was a no brainer!

[Andrew]

hmmm. I am one of those that didn't take cox 121. Swan's average is 130...

So for the sake of 18 points (9 doubled) you took the risk? It has gotta be greedy. Don't get me wrong I was expecting Swan to score 110-130 today. But I already had someone to skipper who had 121 locked in...

I have a high ranking so if i wanna climb up even further I gotta take risks

It was the only scenario I was thinking it was worth the risk, but barely... risk/reward doesn't add up when you've got 121 locked in. If Swan averages 121 this season I'll be happy and he's usually my captain. You can bring up the scores v opponents in previous years all you like, football is such a rapidly changing game it's largely irrelevant in my book.